Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 31;282:113883. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113883

Table A3.

Numbers of practices and older patients before and after requiring a 3-year follow-up and within the latter percentages of patients in each residence group (CH=care home, Com.=community, Undet.=undetermined, Excl.=excluded) for the main and sensitivity analyses.

Cohort start year All practices
Practices with 3-year follow-up
Patients’ Residence (practices with 3-year follow-up)
Alternative identification of care home residents used in sensitivity analysis (practices with 3-year follow-up)
N
Practices
N
Patients
N
Practices
N
Patients
%
Com.
%
CH
%
Undet.
%
Excl.
%
Com.
%
CH
%
Undet.
%
Excl.
2006 350 486,230 342 476,855 92.8 1.4 5.2 0.6 92.8 3.7 2.9 0.6
2007 353 493,463 339 475,045 93.2 1.5 4.8 0.6 93.2 3.6 2.7 0.6
2008 361 505,784 332 466,922 93.5 1.5 4.4 0.6 93.5 3.5 2.4 0.6
2009 356 507,500 315 449,165 93.9 1.5 4.1 0.6 93.9 3.2 2.3 0.6
2010 353 511,704 298 437,485 94.3 1.5 3.7 0.6 94.3 3.0 2.1 0.6
2011 339 498,799 267 397,888 94.4 1.6 3.4 0.6 94.4 3.0 2.0 0.6
2012 326 488,668 215 330,630 94.6 1.7 3.2 0.6 94.6 2.9 1.9 0.6
2013 311 481,975 151 239,594 95.1 1.7 2.6 0.6 95.1 2.7 1.6 0.6
2014 277 439,411 111 166,851 95.9 1.8 1.8 0.5 95.9 2.4 1.2 0.5
2015 224 361,491 86 133,182 96.2 2.1 1.2 0.5 96.2 2.5 0.8 0.5

Note: The Main analysis (and adjusting additionally for the time known in care home) use the identification with results in the middle of the table, while Sensitivity Analysis (less restrictive identification of care home residents) uses the identification reported at the right of the table.