Table 4.
Structural Model Results (N = 296).
| Path | Coefficients | P | 95 % C.I. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Preventive practice→ Intention to dine out | .04 | .94 | [−.11, .12] |
| H2 | Dining involvement → Intention to dine out | .14 | * | [.06,.23] |
| H3 | Preventive practice → Brand trust | .20 | ** | [.22,.40] |
| H4 | Dining involvement → Brand trust | .46 | ** | [.35,.48] |
| H5a | Preventive practice → Brand trust→ Intention to dine out | .24 | [.16, .33] | |
| H5b | Dining involvement → Brand trust→ Intention to dine out | .26 | [.18,.36] |
χ2 = 803.73, df = 287, p < .05; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .06; χ2/df = 2.80.
**
p < .01.
*
p < .05.