Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;10:1072030. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072030

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population stratified for location workers, home workers, and hybrid workers (who worked both on location and from home) during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to January 2022 (n = 28,586).

Location workers
(n = 13,489)
Home workers
(n = 5,971)
Hybrid workers
(n = 9,126)
Mean/% SD/n Mean/% SD/n Mean/% SD/n
Age (in years) 50.9 8.6 49.3* 9.1 49.1Inline graphic 9.3
Sex (% female) 61.3 8,264 56.6* 3,377 60.3 5,503
Education level (%)
Low 20.8 2,807 5.3* 317 4.9Inline graphic 445
Middle 55.7 7,511 28.9* 1,724 30.4Inline graphic 2,778
High 23.5 3,171 65.8* 3,930 64.7Inline graphic 5,903
Occupation (%)
High-skilled white-collar 42.2 5,693 73.2* 4,373 72.4Inline graphic 6,605
Low-skilled white-collar 34.2 4,607 23.2* 1,388 22.3Inline graphic 2,039
High-skilled blue-collar 11.2 1,515 2.1* 128 3.5Inline graphic 323
Low-skilled blue-collar 12.4 1,674 1.4* 82 1.7Inline graphic 159
General health (% excellent/(very) good) 96.5 13,019 95.3* 5,693 95.9Inline graphic 8,748
≥150 min of physical activity per week before COVID-19 pandemic (% yes) 41.9 5,651 44.6* 2,662 42.1 3,838
Sitting >9 h per work day before COVID-19 pandemic (% yes)a 12.1 913 43.3* 1,274 30.4Inline graphic 1,902
*

Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between home workers and location workers tested with independent-samples t-test and chi-square test.

Inline graphicStatistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between hybrid workers and location workers tested with independent-samples t-test and chi-square test.

a

Among 7,573 locations workers, 2,943 home workers, and 6,264 hybrid workers.