Table 1.
Author(s) (Year) Location |
Study Design | Population | Relevant Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Alford et al. (2007) Boston, MA |
Cohort study | Homeless and housed individuals dependent on opioids | The number of patients who left treatment and the reasons for leaving treatment before 12 months, including the treatment failure and successful program departure groups, appeared similar for both homeless and housed patients. Over the 12-month period, no significant associations were found between housing status and use of opioids or other drugs. |
Amodeo et al. (2004) Massachusetts, USA |
Cohort study | Female individuals who inject drugs and reported heroin as primary drug | Homeless females who injected drugs were about 80 % more likely than non-homeless females who injected drugs to use detoxification only (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.804, 95 % CI 1.538, 2.116). |
Bachhuber et al. (2015) USA |
Cohort study | Veterans initiating methadone or buprenorphine treatment | The prevalence of homelessness was 10.2 %, and 5.3 % were at risk for homelessness. Male (vs. female) veterans (10.3 % vs. 8.9 %) and veterans ages 18−34 and 45−54 (12.0 % and 11.7 %, respectively) more frequently screened positive for homelessness. |
Bauer et al. (2016) Boston, MA |
Cohort study | Homeless adults who died of drug overdose | Fewer than half of decedents with documented opioid use had received pharmacological treatment for opioid dependence. In particular, treatment with buprenorphine (4.3 %) and methadone (19.6 %) rarely occurred. |
Chang (2017) San Francisco, CA |
Qualitative study | Formerly homeless women living in supportive housing | Participants described being tethered to the Tenderloin because they needed to access substances or treatment, including substitution therapy. One participant was on methadone maintenance treatment for OUD and felt geographically tied to the neighborhood due to requirements that she obtain methadone treatment on-site at the clinic daily. |
Corsi et al. (2007) Denver, CO |
Cohort study | People who inject opiates | Not considering oneself to be homeless was significantly associated with treatment entry (i.e. methadone maintenance, outpatient drug-free, or residential treatment). Not being homeless independently predicted treatment entry (OR = 1.67, P < 0.05). |
Cousins et al. (2016) Los Angeles, CA |
Cohort study | Patients who obtained XR-NTX for opioid dependence | Significantly more patients in XR-NTX treatment who used heroin identified as homeless compared to those in XR-NTX treatment who used non-heroin opioids (P < 0.05). Identifying as homeless was associated with a lower odds of returning for 2 or more doses of XR-NTX; however, this association was not significant (OR = 0.74, 95 % CI 0.34, 1.61). |
Damian et al. (2017) Baltimore, MD |
Cohort study | Individuals dependent on opioids | Clients who reported unstable housing, including being homeless, residing in a treatment house, or in a transitional house, had a 41% decreased odds of remaining at least 90 days (i.e. higher odds of treatment failure) compared to clients who lived independently at intake (OR = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.37, 0.96). |
Daniulaityte et al. (2019) Dayton, OH |
Cross-sectional study | Adults with OUD who used non-prescribed buprenorphine | Past 6-month homelessness significantly differed between classes. The "Intense Non-Prescribed Buprenorphine Use" class had the lowest prevalence of homelessness (27.3 %), while the "Heavy Heroin/Fentanyl Use" class had the highest prevalence of homelessness (58.9 %). The "More Formal Treatment Use" class had a 55.4 % prevalence of homelessness. |
Deck and Carlson (2004) Oregon and Washington, USA |
Cohort study | Medicaid-eligible adults entering treatment for opiate use | Homeless individuals (vs. other) were significantly less likely to obtain access to MMT in both Oregon (OR = 0.29, P < 0.01) and Washington (OR = 0.55, P < 0.01). |
Dunn et al. (2019) USA |
Cohort study | Patients initiating detoxification and outpatient OUD treatment | Patients in detoxification had lower odds of receiving planned OAT if they were homeless, as compared to having a dependent/independent housing status (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.53, P < 0.001). |
Englander et al. (2020) Portland, OR |
Cohort study | Inpatients receiving addiction consultation services | Current homelessness was significantly associated with initiation of MOUD or medications for alcohol use disorder (AOR = 2.63, 95 % CI 1.52, 4.53). |
Eyrich-Garg et al. (2008) Urban Areas in USA |
Cohort study | Individuals seeking treatment for substance misuse | Inpatient/residential treatment clients were more likely to be literally homeless and marginally housed while outpatient and methadone maintenance clients were more likely to be housed (P < 0.0001). |
Fine et al. (2020) Boston, MA |
Cohort study | Adults who engaged in buprenorphine treatment | Homelessness was independently associated with an increased hazard of all-cause mortality (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] = 1.39, 95 % CI 1.09, 1.78) and an increased hazard of opioid overdose-related mortality (AHR = 1.77, 95 % CI 1.25, 2.50). |
Havens et al. (2009) Baltimore, MD |
Randomized controlled trial | People who inject drugs requesting OAT referrals | Being homeless and not living in one's own apartment/home were not significantly associated with number of days in OAT. |
Hoffman et al. (2019) Six Sites in USA |
Qualitative study | Research staff and providers for an XR-NTX clinical trial | Homelessness impeded prospective participants' ability to engage in the study. Turbulent living conditions were considered to be a universal barrier to recruitment. One clinician explained that in her clinic, recruiters "might have hooked in with somebody but then the housing falls through and then we lose them." |
Jones et al. (2017) USA |
Cohort study | Patients admitted for prescription opioid misuse | Compared to living independently, being homeless was associated with increased relative risk of injection (Relative Risk Ratio [RRR] = 1.73, 95 % CI 1.69, 1.77) and smoking or inhalation (RRR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.12, 1.17) as the usual route of opioid misuse compared to oral misuse. |
Kelly et al. (2018) USA |
Cohort study | Veterans with OUD at Veterans Health Administration facilities that prescribed XR-NTX | Veterans who received XR-NTX were more likely to have been homeless in the past year compared to those who received OAT (AOR = 1.52, 95 % CI 1.07, 2.16). Veterans with a prescription for XR-NTX were more likely to have been homeless in the past year compared to those who received no OUD medication (AOR = 1.58, 95 % CI 1.24, 2.19). |
Kertesz et al. (2003) Boston, MA |
Cohort study | Patients admitted to inpatient detoxification | Compared to homeless persons not using stabilization programs, homeless stabilization program users were less likely to report heroin as their substance of choice (11 % vs. 29 %, P = 0.05). Compared to those without a recent experience of literal homelessness, homelessness was associated with later first use post-detoxification among subjects with heroin as their substance of choice (HR = 0.47, 95 % CI 0.23, 0.95). |
Krawczyk et al. (2020) Maryland, USA |
Cohort study | Adults admitted to outpatient treatment programs for OUD | Homeless individuals were significantly less likely to ever have received methadone or buprenorphine treatment (AOR = 0.46, 95 % CI 0.43, 0.50). |
Krull et al. (2011) USA |
Cross-sectional study | Addiction treatment program directors | Program directors that had less positive attitudes toward buprenorphine as an effective treatment for opiate dependence when they worked in organizations that served a higher percentage of people who were homeless (P < 0.05). |
Li et al. (2019) Boston, MA |
Case-control study | Veterans admitted for inpatient opioid detoxification | 36.8 % were homeless at the time of index admission. 26.5 % of the patients alive at time of follow-up were homeless at the time of index admission compared with 47.1% of the deceased patients. Being homeless at index was trending and associated with a higher all-cause mortality but not significantly (P = 0.09). |
Lundgren et al. (2003) Massachusetts, USA |
Cohort study | People who inject drugs | Homelessness was positively associated with solely using detoxification (OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.27, 1.46) and with using residential treatment (OR = 2.75, 95 % CI 2.55, 2.97) but negatively associated with enrolling in MMT (OR = 0.49, 95 % CI 0.46, 0.53). |
Marienfeld and Rosenheck (2015) USA |
Cohort study | Veterans using MMT and/or living with serious mental illness | Patients enrolled in MMT who had at least 1 serious mental illness were more likely to have experienced homelessness than just those in MMT (RR = 1.52, P < 0.001) and much more likely to have experienced homelessness than just those with at least 1 serious mental illness (RR = 3.95, P < 0.001). |
Masson et al. (2002) San Francisco, CA |
Cohort study | Patients who used medical services and had a diagnosis associated with complications of opioid use | Compared to those who were not homeless, patients experiencing homelessness had greater mean emergency department visits (P < 0.001) and inpatient service (P < 0.0001) use. Patients experiencing homelessness also had higher mean service charges associated with their emergency department (P < 0.02) and inpatient service (P < 0.01) use. |
Midboe et al. (2019) USA |
Cohort study | Veterans who accessed homeless programs in the Veterans Health Administration | 38 % of veterans with OUD received MOUD from the Veterans Health Administration within a year following program entry. Receiving MOUD after program entry was significantly more likely for veterans ages 35 and younger (P < 0.001) and for those without high-dose opioid (P < 0.001) or concomitant opioid-benzodiazepine prescriptions (P = 0.016). |
Nyamathi et al. (2004) Los Angeles, CA |
Cohort study | Women experiencing homelessness | Recent substance use treatment was not significantly associated with a motivation to quit for people who used heroin. |
Patel et al. (2020) Nashville, TN |
Descriptive report | Discharged patients with SUDs | Of the recovery houses that accepted discharged patients from Vanderbilt Medical Center in 2018, 12.5 % allowed patients to remain on buprenorphine/naloxone, 0 % allowed patients to remain on MMT, and 19 % completely allowed naltrexone maintenance therapy. |
Reynoso-Vallejo et al. (2008) Massachusetts, USA |
Cohort study | Latino men who inject drugs | Homelessness was associated with a decreased likelihood of entering methadone maintenance (OR = 0.41, 95 % CI 0.36, 0.47). |
Rivers et al. (2006) USA |
Cohort study | Individuals admitted for substance use treatment | Among both users of heroin and non-users respectively, those who reported dependent living (AOR = 1.90, 95 % CI 1.70, 2.13; OR = 2.23, 95 % CI 1.50, 3.31) and independent living (AOR = 2.11, 95 % CI 1.90, 2.34; OR = 2.73, 95 % CI 1.88, 3.98) were more likely to be planned for MMT than those who were homeless. |
Riggins et al. (2017) Ten Sites in USA |
Cohort study | HIV-infected patients receiving buprenorphine treatment | Homelessness was significantly associated with a decreased odds of self-reported opioid use at any follow-up visit (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI 0.34,0.96). |
Robbins et al. (2010) San Francisco, CA |
Cohort study | People experiencing homelessness who inject drugs | Needing health care 6+ times (OR = 2.12, 95 % CI 1.23, 3.68) and seeking health care (OR = 3.39, 95 % CI 1.77, 6.52) were associated with higher odds of methadone treatment. Methadone treatment was independently associated with increased odds of seeking care (AOR = 2.29; 95 % CI 1.24, 4.24). |
Rose-Jacobs et al. (2019) Boston, MA |
Cohort study | Pregnant women being treated for OUD | 61 % reported housing instability. Compared to those with neither food nor housing instability, those reporting both food and housing instability had greater depressive scores (P = 0.02) and clinically but not statistically significant higher intimate partner vulnerability scores. |
Royse et al. (2000) Five Sites in USA |
Cohort study | Out-of-treatment people who use substances | Non-homeless individuals were more likely to have participated in methadone detoxification (OR = 1.55, P = 0.006) and methadone maintenance (OR = 1.86, P = 0.000) than those who reported homelessness. |
Shah et al. (2000) Baltimore, MD |
Cohort study | People who inject drugs | Regardless of HIV status, not being homeless in the past 6 months was associated with enrollment in MMT (P < 0.05). Homelessness in the past six months was only negatively independently correlated with decreased odds of MMT among HIV-negative subjects (OR = 0.72, 95 % CI 0.55, 0.95). Among those who seroconverted during follow-up, those who reported prior 6-month homelessness were less likely to subsequently enroll in MMT (AOR = 0.05, 95 % CI 0.01, 0.28). |
Simon et al. (2017) Seattle, WA |
Cohort study | Patients seeking treatment at an office-based opioid treatment program | Recent homelessness was associated with a decreased odds of reaching induction (AOR = 0.32, 95 % CI 0.10, 1.02). |
Stein et al. (2017) Fall River, MA |
Cohort study | Patients seeking inpatient opioid detoxification | Patients who preferred residential treatment after detoxification were more likely to be homeless (AOR = 5.71, 95 % CI 1.13, 28.95) than those who preferred no treatment. |
Stein et al. (2015) Fall River, MA |
Cohort study | Patients seeking inpatient opioid detoxification | Patients who preferred residential treatment after detoxification were more likely to be homeless than those who preferred OAT or those who preferred outpatient treatment. There was no evidence that the relationship between homelessness and treatment preference varied by season. |
Stein et al. (2014) Fall River, MA |
Cohort study | Patients seeking inpatient opioid detoxification | Homelessness was not significantly correlated with being uninsured. |
Timko et al. (2016) USA |
Cohort study | Veterans Health Administration patients with alcohol or opiate dependence | Homelessness was associated with receiving detoxification services (AOR = 3.09, 95 % CI 3.00, 3.19), a detoxification follow-up appointment (AOR = 1.62, 95 % CI 1.51, 1.73), and addiction treatment within 30 days (AOR = 1.69, 95 % CI 1.57, 1.81) and within 60 days (AOR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.80, 2.07) of detoxification. |
Upshur et al. (2018) Eleven Sites in USA |
Cohort study | Homeless women with SUDs | Using heroin was associated with more reported use of drug-related services (OR = 1.89, 95 % CI 1.04, 3.47) and with attending Narcotics Anonymous/Cannabis Anonymous (OR = 1.91, 95 % CI 2.45, 67.59). |
Van Ness et al. (2004) Central Harlem, NYC |
Cohort study | People using crack or powder cocaine and/or heroin | Homelessness was not significantly associated with odds of using a methadone clinic. |
Velasquez et al. (2019) New York City, NY |
Qualitative study | Adults with OUD recently released from jail | Recent or chronic homelessness was described as a primary barrier to adhering to prescribed treatment (i.e. XR-NTX, methadone, and/or buprenorphine). |