Table 2.
Indirect effects calculated using bootstrapping procedure (2000 replications).
| Indirect effects - French sample | Bootstrap |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est. | S.E. | p | CI 95% | |
| Off-TAJD → IA → Exhaustion | .08 | .02 | <.001 | (.05, .11) |
| Job insecurity → IA → Exhaustion | .06 | .02 | <.001 | (.03, .09) |
| Gender (1 = F) → IA → Exhaustion |
-.03 |
.01 |
.028 |
(-.05, −.01) |
| Indirect effects - Italian sample | Bootstrap | |||
| Est. |
S.E. |
p |
CI 95% |
|
| Off-TAJD → IA → Exhaustion | .08 | .02 | <.001 | (.05, .12) |
| Job insecurity → IA → Exhaustion | .06 | .02 | <.001 | (.03, .09) |
| Gender (1 = F) → IA → Exhaustion | -.03 | .01 | .024 | (-.05, −.01) |
Note. All parameter estimates are presented as standardized coefficients. CI = confidence interval. IA = Internet addiction.