Table 2.
Average values for efficiency metrics across the four studies.
| Path Ratio | Average Sway Distance (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | 80.15 ± 30.08 | |||
| More affected | Less affected | More affected | Less affected | ||
| Study 2 | |||||
| P1 | 0.47 ± 0.25 | 0.63 ± 0.18 | 106.3 ± 65.9 | 146.0 ± 105.5 | |
| P2 | 0.55 ± 0.22 | 0.51 ± 0.23 | 182.2 ± 87.7 | 115.4 ± 61.9 | |
| P3 | 0.20 ± 0.12 | 0.15 ± 0.14 | 367.6 ± 102.8 | 271.4 ± 193.1 | |
| Study 3 | |||||
| P1 | 0.56 ± 0.17 | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 151.9 ± 52.5 | 131.6 ± 40.8 | |
| P2 | 0.47 ± 0.23 | 0.51 ± 0.21 | 170.9 ± 88.8 | 156.3 ± 86.0 | |
| P3 | 0.53 ± 0.23 | 0.54 ± 0.21 | 182.4 ± 115.2 | 175.8 ± 98.8 | |
| Study 4 | |||||
| P1 | 0.35 ± 0.24 | 0.38 ± 0.26 | 253.9 ± 126.0 | 233.0 ± 133.0 | |
| P2 | 0.50 ± 0.20 | 0.51 ± 0.17 | 112.0 ± 76.6 | 122.0 ± 67.1 | |
Note. All values reported as mean ± standard deviation.