Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;33(1):152–166. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac058

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a) Positive correlation was found for the neural representation of original meaning of WORD-1 (before context is presented) on trials judged to be unrelated (Z > 2.6, corrected). b) Decoding of this cluster-corrected spatial map a) using Neurosynth revealed terms linked to attention control and task demands. c) Negative correlations were found for the neural representation of original meaning of WORD-1 (before context is presented) and WORD-2 (after context is presented) for items judged to be related. d) Positive correlation was found for the neural representation of context-dependent meaning of WORD-2 for trials judged to be related (Z > 2.6, corrected). e) Decoding of this cluster-corrected spatial map d) using Neurosynth revealed terms linked to semantic and language processing. f) Negative correlation was found for the neural representation of context-dependent meaning of WORD-2 for the trials judged to be unrelated (Z > 2.6, corrected). g) Region of interest analysis: a spherical ROI (117 voxels, right top panel) was created for the lvATL around the peak voxel at MNI coordinate (x = −36, y = −18, z = −30) reported by Binney et al. (2016). Significant positive correlation was found for the neural representation of context-dependent meaning of WORD-2 in trials judged to be related. *P < 0.05.