Abstract
Objective:
To investigate the relationship between outcomes and demographic-clinical variables in in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).
Methods:
The Medline database was searched along with Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, and Persian language database without time limitation until January 6th, 2020. The inclusion criteria included papers published in journals or presented in English and Persian congress that reported the IHCA outcomes based on the Utstein criterion. All the descriptive, cross-sectional, and cohort studies on CPR were covered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary checks covered titles and abstracts followed by a full-text check of the remaining papers from the first screening stage. Data analysis was done using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software version 2.0. The finding’s heterogeneity was checked using Q and Cochran tests with heterogeneity >50% and the random-effects model was used to estimate survival and favorable neurological outcome (FNO) in the analysis. To detect the publication bias of studies, the subgroup test, meta-regression test, sensitivity analysis test, funnel plot, and Eagger’s regression test were used.
Results:
Survival to discharge was 19.1% (95% CI=16.8-21.7) and FNO in the survived to discharge cases was 68.1% (95% CI=55.8-78.3). Survival to discharge and FNO were notably higher in men, CPR duration <15min, and shockable dysrhythmias.
Conclusion:
IHCA outcomes are poor in developing countries. The outcomes of IHCA in terms of gender were inconsistent with the result reported by other meta-analyses.
Key Words: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR, Resuscitation, Cardiac arrest, Neurological
Introduction
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a measure to compensate the function and return vital performance of the heart and lungs and was developed in 1950 [1]. The first instruction was published in 1996 which was later revised in 2020 [2]. Although CPR is the only efficient treatment in the case of cardiac arrest as a lethal condition, the success rate of the procedure is still too low and the survival-to-discharge rate ranges from 0 to 20%. There has been no significant improvement in this rate over the past 30 years [3-5]. This can be justified by the aging population, increased prevalence of physical health problems, and longer response time in the prehospital emergency system, which is due to the growing population and traffic jams in cities [5-9].
Assessing CPR outcomes yields a valuable indicator that is used by the American Heart Association to revise CPR instructions based on the Utstein criterion and its relationship with demographical variables, patient’s background and other variables [9-11]. Two studies of Shao et al., [12] and Movahedi et al., [13] showed that gender affects survival. Other studies have emphasized shockable dysrhythmias as an effective factor in survival to discharge. According to Bergum et al., [14], 53% of cardiac arrest cases with shockable dysrhythmia have led to successful CPR and discharge. Hirlekar et al., [9] and Salari et al., [15] have reported a significant relationship between survival to discharge and shockable rhythms.
The neurological outcomes and side effects are the risk factors of a successful CPR that can be affected by prolonged CRP duration and decreased heart output which in return decreases cerebral perfusion [16]. Although there is a specific instruction about the time of CPR termination in pre-hospital cases, the new instructions available in hospitals are ambiguous and challenging [17]. The American Heart Association has given room for clinical judgment in this regard [18]. At any rate, cerebral damages are generally considered a risk factor in cardiac arrest patients. The CPR duration is an efficient factor that needs further examination; still, there is no review study on the studies in this field. Therefore, the present systematic meta-analysis is based on the question of “is there any relationship between the CPR outcomes and demographic-clinical variables (first document, gender, CPR duration) in patients with In-hospital Cardiac arrest (IHCA)”?
Materials and Methods
Study Design
This systematic review and meta-analysis was funded by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and reported following the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines to report the systematic reviews and meta-analysis of observational studies [19, 20]. In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between resuscitation outcomes include survival to discharge, and favorable neurological outcome (FNO) at discharge with the first document, gender, and duration of CPR in IHCA patients. As a result, PECO in the current study is defined as P (patients): Patients with IHCA, E (exposure): Advanced in-hospital resuscitation, C (comparison): Gender / First document (shockable with non-Shockable dysrhythmias)/ Duration of resuscitation (≤15min with >15 min), As for outcomes (O in PECO): Survival to discharge or 30-day survival and FNO at discharge included Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) ≤2.
Search Strategy
The searching process was initiated by selecting keywords that included both standardized medical subject heading (MESH) and text word includes. With the aim of obtaining papers published in journals and presented in congress, Medline database along Scopus, Web of Science, and Persian language databases including SID and Magiran was searched without time limitation until January 6th, 2020. In addition, a general search was performed in Google Scholar to obtain possibly missed manuscripts. All the found materials were checked based on exclusion and inclusion criteria and irrelevant cases were removed from the study. The search strategy is presented in Appendix 1.
Selection Criteria
The inclusion criteria included papers published in journals or presented in English and Persian congress on adults (older than 13 years old), that reported the outcomes of IHCA (survival to discharge or 30 days’ survival and FNO at discharge) based on the Utstein criterion, or they have reviewed the relationship between a “first document, gender or CPR duration”, and outcomes of IHCA. Qualitative works, letters to the editor, review studies, repetitious works, studies on animals, infants, children, studies limited to an initial success rate of CPR without any results about survival to discharge, studies with less than 30 subjects, meta-analysis, structured studies, studies on out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or both (undetermined of the type of cardiac arrest), studies with overlapped study populations, studies on survived patients and without information about the population under study were excluded.
Data Collection
All the descriptive, cross-sectional, and cohort studies on CPR were covered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts of the gathered papers and any disagreements within the process were resolved using a third researcher’s opinion. Primary checks covered titles and abstracts followed by a full-text check of the remaining papers from the first screening stage. Data extraction was performed by two researchers, and the final and agreed information of articles was added to a researchers-designed checklist. The checklist included information about author name, publication year, time, type, and place of study, the total number of samples, outcomes (survival to discharge and FNO included CPC≤2), and outcomes based on gender, CPR duration, and first document of patients. Table 1 lists the information extracted from the articles.
Table 1.
Output information from related articles
| Total N | Total N | Total N |
FNO
a
N (%) |
Survival to discharge or 30 days N (%) | Study place |
Study time
(study type) |
The first author | Row | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival based on CPR duration N (%) | Survival based on First Document N (%) | Survival based on gender N (%) | |||||||||
| FNO based on CPR duration N (%) | FNO based on the First Document N (%) | FNO based on gender N (%) | |||||||||
| >15min | ≤15min | Shockable | Non-Shockable | Male | Female | N (total) | |||||
| NR | NR | 12528 | 39391 | NR | NR‡ | 6850(75.07) | 9125(17.57) | U.S. | 1999-2005 (Prospective) |
Meaney et al., [22] | 1 |
| NR | NR | 4656(37.16) | 4469(11.34) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 3717(79.83) | 3133(70.1) | NR | NR | 51919 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR (93) | 5113(28.3) | Swedish Register | 2006-2015 (Retrospective) |
Hessulf et al. [23] | 2 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 18069 | |||||
| NR | NR | 279 | 1676 | 1327 | 628 | 161(81.73) | 197(10.1) | South India | Unknown (Prospective) |
Johnson et al., [24] | 3 |
| NR | NR | 51(18.27) | 146(8.71) | 127(9.50) | 70(11.1) | ||||||
| NR | NR | 47(92) | 114(78) | NR | NR | 1955 | |||||
| NR | NR | 291 | 1248 | 964 | 575 | 207(90.79) | 228(14.8) | Italy | 2012-2014 (Retrospective) |
Radeschi et al., [25] | 4 |
| NR | NR | 112(38.49) | 116(9.29) | 139(14.42) | 89(15.48) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1539 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 63 | 58 | NR | 13(11) | Michigan.US. | 1983-1984 (Retrospective) |
Urberg et al., [26] | 5 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 7(11.11) | 6(10.34) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 121 | |||||
| NR | NR | 292 | 897 | 895 | 478 | NR | 376(27.38) | Karolinska Stockholm | 2007-2015 (Retrospective) |
Hjalmarsson et al., [27] | 6 |
| NR | NR | 171(58.56) | 151(16.83) | 251(28.4) | 125(26.15) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1373 | |||||
| NR | NR | 703 | 2891 | NR | NR | NR | 1124(27.8) | Denmark | 2017-2018 (Retrospective |
Andersen et al., [28] | 7 |
| NR | NR | 405(57.6) | 466(16.1) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 4049 | |||||
| NR | NR | 1356 | 3410 | NR | NR | 1660(91.3) | 1818(30.13) | Swedish | 2015-2017 (Retrospective) |
Lundin et al., [29] | 8 |
| NR | NR | 857 (63.20) | 600(17.59) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 809(94.4) | 543(90.5) | NR | NR | 6033 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 25(56.82) | 44(11.28) | Konya, Turkey | 2013-2015 (Retrospective) |
Cicekci et al., [30] | 9 |
| 15(NR) | 29(NR) | 34(NR) | 10(NR) | 34(NR) | 10(NR) | ||||||
| 7(46.67) | 18(62.7) | 20(58.82) | 5(50) | NR | NR | 390 | |||||
| 133 | 635 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 471(29) | Swedish | 2007-2017 (Retrospective) |
Rohlin et al., [31] | 10 |
| 36(27.7) | 405(63.78) | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1639 | |||||
| NR | NR | 8361 | 24978 | NR | NR | 4390(67.69) | 6485(17.57) | US& Canadian’s H | 2000-2004 (Retrospective) |
Nadkarni et al., [32] | 11 |
| NR | NR | 3013(36) | 2719(10.88) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 2268(75.27) | 1675(61.60) | NR | NR | 36902 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 989 | 650 | NR | 470(29) | Karolinska University | 2007-2017 (Retrospective) |
Qvick et al., [33] | 12 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 277(28) | 193(29.69) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1639 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 193 | 115 | NR | 120(39) | Australia | 1984-1991 (Retrospective) |
Heller et al., [34] | 13 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 75(39) | 45(39) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 308 | |||||
| NR | NR | 21 | 523 | 320 | 224 | 6(21.43) | 28(5.1) | Taiwan | 2008- 2011 (Retrospective) |
Kung et al., [35] | 14 |
| NR | NR | 4(19.04) | 24(4.59) | 15(4.68) | 13(5.80) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 544 | |||||
| NR | NR | 148 | 267 | 246 | 169 | NR | 113(27.2) | New Zealand | 2004-2006 (Retrospective) |
Jones et al., [36] | 15 |
| NR | NR | 78(52.70) | 35(13.10) | 75(30.49) | 38(22.48) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 415 | |||||
| NR | NR | 23 | 80 | 55 | 36 | NR | 12(11.7) | Turkey | 2001-2002 (Prospective) |
Tok et al., [37] | 16 |
| NR | NR | 7(30.4) | 5(6.2) | 6(10.7) | 6(14.2) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 103 | |||||
| NR | NR | 151 | 551 | 399 | 303 | NR | 93(13.24) | Afula, Israel | 1995-2015 (Retrospective) |
Khatib et al., [38] | 17 |
| NR | NR | 36(23.84) | 57(10.34) | 56(14.03) | 37(12.21) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 702 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 372915 | 311423 | NR | 68477(24.62) | USA | 2003-2011 (Retrospective) |
Kolte et al., [39] | 18 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 88753(23.8) | 79724(25.6) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 684338 | |||||
| NR | NR | 39 | 67 | NR | NR | NR | 32(16.6) | U. K | 1987-1988 (Prospective) |
Thomas et al., [40] | 19 |
| NR | NR | 14(35.90) | 8(11.4) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 192 | |||||
| NR | NR | 14 | 83 | NR | NR | 12(100) | 12(11.1) | Kenya | 2013 (Retrospective) |
Wachira et al., [41] | 20 |
| NR | NR | 1(7.1) | 9(10.84) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 1 (100) | 9(100) | NR | NR | 108 | |||||
| NR | NR | 131 | 384 | 340 | 234 | NR | 191(33.27) | Stockholm, Sweden | 2012-2017 (Retrospective) |
Widestedt et al., [42] | 21 |
| NR | NR | 78(59.54) | 89(23.18) | 119(35) | 72(30.77) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 574 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 926 | 598 | 110(51.16) | 215(14.1) | Taiwan | 2006-2014 (Retrospective) |
Wang et al., [43] | 22 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 138(14.9) | 77(12.9) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 82(59.42) | 28(36.36) | 1524 | |||||
| NR | NR | 42 | 56 | 74 | 46 | NR | 27(22.5) | Croatia | 2003 (Prospective) |
Rakic et al., [44] | 23 |
| NR | NR | 20(47.62) | 6(10.71) | 16(21.6) | 11(23.9) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 120 | |||||
| NR | NR | 423 | 2289 | NR | NR | NR | 247(9.10) | Beijing, China | 2014 (Prospective) |
Shao et al., [12] | 24 |
| NR | NR | 93(21.98) | 154(6.73) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 2712 | |||||
| NR | NR | 63 | 290 | NR | NR | NR | 49(13.88) | Singapore | 2008-2009 (Retrospective) |
Chua et al., [45] | 25 |
| NR | NR | 17(27) | 32(11) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 353 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 159 | 96 | NR | 65(24.49) | USA Stony Brook Univ | 2012-2013 (Prospective) |
Garry et al., [46] | 26 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 43(27) | 22(22.9) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 255 | |||||
| NR | NR | 40 | 143 | NR | NR | NR | 55(30) | Unknown | 2017-2018 (Retrospective) |
Chong et al., [47] | 27 |
| NR | NR | 21(52.5) | 34(23.8) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 183 | |||||
| NR | NR | 61 | 113 | NR | NR | NR | 44(13) | Dayton Ohio | 1988-1990 (Retrospective) |
Saklayen et al., [48] | 28 |
| NR | NR | 9(14.7) | 1(1) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 340 | |||||
| NR | NR | 57 | 126 | NR | NR | NR | 22(12.02) | Finland | 1993-1997 (Prospective) |
Skrifvars et al., [49] | 29 |
| NR | NR | 15(28) | 7(5.55) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 13(86.67) | NR | NR | NR | 183 | |||||
| NR | NR | 138 | 347 | NR | NR | 105(77.21) | 136(27.8) | Japan | 2008-2009 (Prospective) |
Yokoyama et al., [50] | 30 |
| NR | NR | 63(45.65) | 73(21.04) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 56(88.89) | 49(67.12) | NR | NR | 491 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 53639 | 42213 | 13244(78.09) | 16960(17.69) | Philadelphia | 2000-2008 (Prospective) |
Topjian et al., [51] | 31 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 9817(18.30) | 7593(17.99) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 7462(76.01) | 5782(76.15) | 95852 | |||||
| NR | NR | 142 | 237 | 245 | 172 | NR | 86(21) | New York | 2007-2013 (Retrospective) |
DeVoe et al., [52] | 32 |
| NR | NR | 46(32.39) | 28(11.81) | 52(21.22) | 34(19.77) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 417 | |||||
| NR | NR | 261 | 240 | 340 | 217 | 192(92.31) | 208(37.34) | Sweden | 1994-1998 (Prospective) |
Herlitz et al., [53] | 33 |
| NR | NR | 147(56.32) | 40(16.67) | 129(37.94) | 79(36.40) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 121(94) | 71(91) | 557 | |||||
| NR | NR | 80 | 207 | 176 | 111 | NR | 58(20.2) | Sweden | 2007-2010 (Retrospective) |
Ohlsson et al., [54] | 34 |
| NR | NR | 39(48.75) | 19(9.18) | 39(22.16) | 19(17.12) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 287 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 418 | 262 | NR | 125(18.38) | New York | 2012 - 2018 (Prospective) |
Parikh et al., [55] | 35 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 92(22) | 33(12.50) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 680 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 9166 | 5767 | NR | 4197(28.1) | Swedish Register | 2007-2014 (Prospective) |
Al-Dury et al., [56] | 36 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 2680(29.24) | 1517(26.30) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 14933 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 7034 (80.6) | 9912(15.4) | (NRCPR) Michigan | 2000-2008 (Prospective) |
Goldberger et al., [57] | 37 |
| 2886(NR) | 5838(NR) | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||
| 2296(79.56) | 4738(81.2) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 64339 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 196 | 90 | NR | 107(37.4) | Swedish | 2007-2011 (Retrospective) |
Israelsson et al., [58] |
38 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | 80(40.82) | 27(30) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 286 | |||||
| 43 | 90 | 140 | 180 | NR | NR | NR | 68(21.25) | Fujian, China | 2012-2016 (Retrospective) |
Li et al., [59] | 39 |
| 12(27.91) | 55(61.11) | 53(37.86) | 15(8.33) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 320 | |||||
| 125(>10min) | 127(<10min) | 57 | 195 | 137 | 115 | NR | 44(17.50) | South India | 2016-2017 (Prospective) |
Ravipragasam et al., [60] | 40 |
| 18(14.4) | 26(20.47) | 16(28.08) | 28(14.36) | 33(24.09) | 11(9.56) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 252 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 10(13.5) | Iran | 2010 (Prospective) |
Keivanpazhoh et al., [61] | 41 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 74 | |||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 10(3.3) | Iran | Unknown (Prospective) |
Jaberi et al., [62] | 42 |
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 302 | |||||
| NR | NR | 78 | 172 | 149 | 101 | NR | 18(7.2) | Iran | 2006 (Retrospective) |
Salari et al., [15] | 43 |
| NR | NR | 15(19.2) | 3(1.7) | 10(6.7) | 8(7.9) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 250 | |||||
| 41(NR) | 83(NR) | 61 | 126 | 132 | 57 | NR | 57(30.2) | Germany | 2004-2006 (Retrospective) |
Mohnle et al., [63] | 44 |
| 12(29.27) | 45(54.22) | 30(49.18) | 27(21.43) | 42(31.82) | 15(26.31) | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 189 | |||||
| NR | NR | 72 | 207 | NR | NR | NR | 71(25) | Norway | 2009-2013 (Prospective) |
Bergum et al., [14] | 45 |
| NR | NR | 38(52.8) | 30(14.29) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 306 | |||||
| NR | NR | 3982 | 17018 | NR | NR | 3759(97.5) | 4153(18.35) | UK | 2011-2013 (Prospective) |
Nolan et al., [64] | 46 |
| NR | NR | 1727(49) | 1735(10.19) | NR | NR | ||||||
| NR | NR | 1602(99.1) | 1524(96) | NR | NR | 22628 | |||||
a Favorable Neurological Outcome (CPC<=2); bNo Reported
Outcome
The primary outcome of the present meta-analysis was an overall survival rate to discharge or 30-day survival and FNO at discharge included CPC≤2. The secondary outcome was survival rate to discharge or 30-day survival and FNO at discharge based on gender, first document rhythm, and duration of resuscitation (≤15min, >15 min).
Methodological Quality (Risk of Bias) Assessment
The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) for the cross-sectional study was used to the risk of bias assessment [21]. The searched articles were checked based on CASP checklist criteria by two independent researchers, and each researcher independently assessed the articles, and any disagreements within the process were resolved using a third researcher’s opinion.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was done using CMA version 2.0. The findings’ heterogeneity was checked using Q and Cochran tests with heterogeneity >50%, the random-effects model was used to estimate survival and FNO in the analysis. We used random effect model for analysis because of the high heterogeneity (>50%) of the studies, studies’ variation in terms of population, event rate of survival to discharge and location of studies. The subgroup test (to estimate the relationship between survival and FNO and qualitative variables like gender and first document), meta-regression test (to check the relationship between survival and FNO and quantitative variables like publication year); funnel plot, and Eagger’s regression test (to check publication bias) were used. Finally, the sensitivity analysis test was used to evaluate the effect of each study on the final results of the meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis responses to the question “Are the findings robust to the decisions made in the process of obtaining them?”, if there are some studies that effects are too different from other studies, we should be dubious about the results and recommend more studies.
Results
Study Characteristics
Our search strategy retrieved 8728 records, of which 5840 remained after duplicates were removed. The parallel exclusion of studies resulted in 326 articles eligible for detailed assessment based on title and abstract. Finally, we included 46 studies in our systematic review and meta-analysis [12, 14, 15, 22-64] (Figure 1).
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of search strategy and included studies
Risk of Bias Assessment
CASP checklist was used to the risk of bias assessment [21]. This checklist has 11 items that 10 items evaluate the content of the article from different angles and item 11 is related to commenting on the overall quality of the article based on the result obtained from the first 10 items. Based on the researchers’ evaluation of the articles, about 74% of the articles published in journals were evaluated as an excellent and only 2 articles were in an acceptable condition. In 12 articles, bias measurement and classification methods could not be deduced, and in 6 articles, there are enough participants to minimize the play of chance (Table 2).
Table 2.
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment (CASP Checklist)
| Item 11 | Item 10 | Item 9 | Item 8 | Item 7 | Item 6 | Item 5 | Item 4 | Item 3 | Item 2 | Item 1 | Author; Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E€ | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y¶ | Meaney and et al; 2010 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Hessulf and et al;2017 |
| G¥ | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | C‡ | Y | Y | Y | Johnson and et al;2014 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Radeschi and et al;2017 |
| F₣ | N | Y | C | N | N | Y | N† | Y | Y | Y | Urberg and et al;1987 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Hjalmarsson and et al;2017 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Andersen and et al;2019 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Lundin and et al;2019 |
| G | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Cicekci and et al;2018 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Rohlin and et al;2018 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Nadkarni and et al;2006 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Qvick and et al;2018 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Heller and et al;1995 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Kung and et al;2014 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Jones and et al;2011 |
| G | C | Y | C | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Tok and et al;2004 |
| C | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Kolte and et al;2014* |
| G | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Thomas and et al;1990 |
| F | N | Y | C | N | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Wachira and et al;2015 |
| E | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Widestedt and et al;2018 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Wang and et al;2016 |
| G | N | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Rakic and et al;2005 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Shao and et al;2016 |
| C | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Chua and et al;2015* |
| C | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Garry and et al;2015* |
| C | Y | Y | C | C | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Chong and et al;2018* |
| G | Y | Y | C | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Saklayen and et al;1990 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Skrifvars and et al;2005 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Yokoyama and et al;2011 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Topjian and et al;2010 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | DeVoe et al;2016 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Herlitz et al;2001 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Ohlsson et al;2014 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Parikh et al;2019 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Al-Dury et al;2017 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | C | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Israelsson et al;2014 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Mohnle et al;2012 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Ravipragasam and et al;2019 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | C | Y | Y | Y | Li et al;2019 |
| G | Y | Y | N | C | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Jaberi et al;2011 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Goldberger et al;2012 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Nolan et al;2014 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Bergum et al;2015 |
| F | N | Y | C | N | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Keivanpazhoh et al;2011 |
| G | Y | Y | N | Y | C | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Salari et al;2010 |
| E | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Khatib and et al;2017 |
Item1: Did the study address a clearly focused issue?
Item2: Did the authors use an appropriate method to answer their question?
Item3: Were the subjects recruited in an acceptable way?
Item4: Were the measures accurately measured to reduce bias?
Item5: Were the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?
Item6: Did the study have enough participants to minimize the play of chance?
Item7: How are the results presented and what is the main result?
Item8: Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?
Item9: Is there a clear statement of findings?
Item10: Can the results be applied to the local population?
Item11: How valuable is the research?
*. presented in Congress; ¶. Yes; ‡. Can’t Tell; †. NO; €.Excellent; ¥.GOOD; ₣. Fair
Publication Bias
There were no evidences of publication bias in the assessment of survival to discharge on women (t=0.33, p=0.13), survival to discharge on men (t=1.5, p=0.74) and the rate of FNO (t=0.65, p=0.52) based on the results of funnel plot and Eagger’s regression test (Figure 2).
Fig. 2.
Regression of survival and the time of publication of articles, Regression of FNO (CPC<=2) and survival to discharge and Funnel plot for publication bias in survival to discharge of women, men and FNO
Sensitivity Analysis
The results of the sensitivity analysis test showed the parallel effect of each study on the conclusion and the robustness of the model; therefore, we did not delete any studies to compare with the remaining results (Figure 3).
Fig. 3.
The results of sensitivity analysis test
Meta-analysis
Survival to Discharge
Based on the results of systematic and meta-analysis review on 46 articles of 1,020,799 cases with IHCA, survival to discharge was equal to 19.1% (95% CI=16.8-21.7) (Figure 4). In addition, meta-regression results showed that survival to discharge rate had a declining trend over the past few years. Figure 5 illustrates heterogeneity in survival to discharge in different studies and countries, therefore, the higher survival rates are in Australia (39%), Sweden with (32.7%) and Germany (30.2%), and the lowest survival rates are in Iran (6.9%) and Taiwan (8.7%) (Q-value=20707.47, p≤0.001).
Fig. 4.
Survival to discharge (Survival rate: 19.1%, Q-value=11896.47, P<0.001)
Fig. 5.
Survival rate to discharge based on study location
The results about survival to discharge in men and women showed that survival to discharge in women with 364,593 cases was 19.8% (95% CI=17.6-22.2) and this figure for men with 444,463 cases was 22.2% (95% CI=20.2-24.3) (Figure 6).
Fig. 6.
Comparison of survival to discharge in female with male
Only three studies used a similar pattern to report the survival to discharge based on CPR duration. The meta-analysis results on these studies indicated that out of 2,148 cases with initial successful resuscitation (ROSC) and CPR duration ≤15min, survival rate was 47.3% (95% CI=28.9-66.6) and in CPR duration>15min in 359 cases, this rate was significantly lower (13.2%) (95% CI=6.5-25) (Figure 7). Also, survival rate to discharge in 135,996 cases under study with shockable and non-shockable dysrhythmias was 39.3% (95% CI=35.6-43.1) and 12.1% (95% CI=11-13.3), respectively (p≤0.001) (Figure 8).
Fig. 7.
Survival rate to discharge based on CPR duration
Fig. 8.
Survival to discharge based on the first document rhythm
FNO (CPC≤2) at Discharge
From 46 articles entered to the meta-analysis, 15 articles with total cases of 302,850 reported FNO at discharge. This index relative to survivors until discharge was equal to 68.1% (95% CI=55.8-78.3) (Figure 9). Meta-regression results on survival to discharge and FNO showed that the higher of survival to discharge and the higher of FNO (p<0.001) (Figure 2).
Fig. 9.
Favorable neurological outcome during discharge (CPC<=2)
Only three studies reported FNO related to gender. According to the meta-analysis results, FNO in men and women at discharge was 79.1 (95% CI=63-89.4) and 71.2 (95% CI=41.3-89.7), respectively; therefore, men had better outcomes (Figure 10). In addition to gender, shockable background dysrhythmias were another factor in neurological outcome. With shockable and non-shockable dysrhythmias, FNO was equal to 86.4 (95% CI=79.9-91) and 76.9 (95% CI=67.4-84.3), respectively (Figure 11). In addition, taking into account the limitations of the studies, it was not possible to assess the relationship between FNO and CPR duration (only two articles entered the meta-analysis). The assessment of the results of these two studies showed the duration of CPR affected the FNO at discharge, therefore, it will be high in CPR duration and low in FNO index (Table 1).
Fig. 10.
Favorable Neurological Outcome (CPC<=2) by gender
Fig. 11.
Favorable Neurological Outcome (CPC<=2) based on the first document rhythm
Discussion
This systematic review study and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the relationship between resuscitation outcomes and demographic-clinical variables in patients with IHCA. By resuscitation outcome, survival to discharge or 30-day survival and FNO were intended. Survival to discharge or 30-day discharge results of 46 articles was 19.1% based on meta-analysis [12, 14, 15, 22-64]. In addition, the results of our study showed that the survival to discharge rate had a declining trend over the past few years. According to the updated report by the American Heart Association, survival to discharge is equal to 25%, in addition, D’Arrigo et al., reported this index equal to 37.9% [65, 66]. One reason for the declining statistics can be the inclusion of studies conducted in developing countries.
FNO at discharge was 68.1%, compared to the results of the meta-analysis performed in-hospital cardiac arrest which shows a declining trend over the past few years [65]. According to the results, FNO has a direct relationship with patients’ survival, therefore, it will be high in the survival to discharge and the FNO. The decrease in survival to discharge can explain the decrease in FNO.
Survival to discharge or 30-day survival and FNO were notably higher in men compared to women. Bougouin et al., [67] systematically assessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and reported results inconsistent with the present study. The different survival rates between men and women are indicative to a pathophysiological difference of cardiac arrest in women and men, and the results of our study challenge the classic paradigm of better prognosis in women. According to this paradigm, female hormones improve vascular performance at higher fertility ages by lowering lipoproteins levels and decreasing the risk of cardiac arrest [68-70]. This finding is also contradictory to the fact that estrogen has a protective effect on the nervous and cardiac system [71, 72]. The studies showed that the rate of shockable dysrhythmias in men was higher than in women [9, 14, 15, 22, 33]. Sensitivity of shockable dysrhythmias to timely shocks [14] can be a reason for different survival rates and better neurological outcomes in men.
Survival to discharge and FNO with shockable dysrhythmias were notably higher than those with non-shockable dysrhythmias. One of the predictors of survival to discharge in D’Arrigo et al., [66] was the shockable background dysrhythmia. Only in one study with a small sample group, survival to discharge was higher with non-shockable dysrhythmias [41]. On the other hand, studies on several clinics and larg sample groups showed that shockable dysrhythmias were determinants of survival to discharge and FNO [11, 32, 64]. There is reliable evidence of reversibility, survival to discharge, and FNO when a defibrillator is used soon enough [14].
The results indicated that CPR duration was a determinant of survival to discharge, therefore, survival to discharge was notably higher when less than 15min compared with CPR duration >15min. There were a limited number of the evaluated CPR studies duration effect on survival to discharge; still, the results supported the higher survival to discharge with shorter CPR duration [31, 59, 60, 63]. In addition, despite the limited findings of the duration of CPR and FNO (CPC≤2) at discharge that did not allow a meta-analysis, the results showed that the duration of CPR affected neurological performance at discharge [30, 57]. Schultz et al., [73] argued that CPR duration affected the resuscitation outcomes and concluded that the survival rate for CPR duration >10min was only 2%. Ballew et al., [74] reported similar results so the survival to discharge with CPR duration <5min and CPR duration >20min was 45% and 5%, respectively. These findings and other studies show that resuscitation duration is an independent factor to predict the low survival rate in patients after CPR [75]. Goldberger et al., [57] reported contrary results. The results of a multi-center study by Goldberger et al., [57] showed a better survival to discharge at hospitals with longer CPR duration. They argued that computation of total CPR duration for the survived distribute results toward a shorter duration of resuscitation. However, like other studies, Goldberger noted that duration of resuscitation was a factor in the poor neurological outcome in discharged patients.
We are aware that our research may have some limitations. Search bias in Persian and English languages, unavailability of some of the studies full-text, and lack of adequate information in the available summaries were some of the limitations. In addition, limitations includes using of different models by studies on the relationship of CPR duration, the outcome of CPR and failure to report the results based on different age groups.
Conclusion
In conclusion, inconsistent with some of the meta-analysis studies on OHCA, our results showed that survival to discharge rate with strong evidence, and FNO in adults (CPC≤2) in men was higher than women. Despite limitations in studies with a similar time pattern on the effect of CPR duration on survival to discharge and FNO, the results of the present meta-analysis showed this factor effect on the mentioned outcomes. Adherence to the same pattern in the classification of the variables studied in the report on the outcomes of CPR will pave the way for future meta-analysis studies.
The results of our study showed that the outcomes of cardiac arrest in developing countries are weak and make it clearer to health care providers for identifying gaps in the survival chain and improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Although non-shockable dysrhythmias and prolonged resuscitation time were identified as factors associated with weaker resuscitation outcomes, patient’s significant percentage with non-shockable dysrhythmias or prolonged resuscitation, with FNO was discharged. Therefore, adherence to guidelines until the end of resuscitation time and these factors non-interference in the quality of resuscitation is recommended for rescuers. On the other hand, about 32% of discharged resuscitated people are in the CPC>2 and will experience-dependent life. This result can be considered by health policymakers for rehabilitation needs and planning.
Declarations
Ethics approval:
The Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, approved this study (codes: 9803282410 and IR.UMSHA.REC.1398.208).
Consent for publication:
Not applicable.
Conflict of interests:
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Funding:
Financial resources for the design of the present study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript provided by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
Authors’ contributions:
Study design: AG, KO, and MKH; Data collection: AG and ARA; Data extraction: AG and ARA; Analysis: AG and ARA; Drafting: AG, KO, ARA; Critically revised the paper: All authors.
Acknowledgments:
We would like to thank the Research Administration of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, who supported us in doing this study.
Appendix
Appendix 1.
Search query
| Filters applied: Full text, Congress, Observational Study, Humans, English, Persian, Adolescent: 13-18 years, Adult: 19+ year |
| Search terms: |
| Medline search query 1. (“Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Advanced life support”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“In-hospital Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (IHCA[Title/Abstract]) AND (“Neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract] OR “success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract] OR “Survival to discharge”[Title/Abstract] OR “Favorable neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) 2. (“Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“In-hospital Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Survival to discharge”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Favorable neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) AND (Sex[Title/Abstract] OR gender[Title/Abstract] OR “Duration of resuscitation”[Title/Abstract] OR Shockable [Title/Abstract] OR “non-shockable” [Title/Abstract])\ Scince direct query[Due to limited acceptance of booleans connectors (max 8 per field)] 1. (“Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Advanced life support”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“In-hospital Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (IHCA[Title/Abstract]) AND (“Neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract] OR “success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract] OR “Survival to discharge”[Title/Abstract] OR “Favorable neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) 2. ( “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR ( “In-hospital Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Survival to discharge”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Favorable neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) AND ( sex”[Title/Abstract] OR gender[Title/Abstract] OR “duration of resuscitation” [Title/Abstract]) 3. ( “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR ( “In-hospital Cardiac arrest”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Survival to discharge”[Title/Abstract]) OR (“Favorable neurological outcome”[Title/Abstract]) AND ( shockable[Title/Abstract] OR “non-shockable”[Title/Abstract]) Scopus search query 1. TITLE-ABS-KEY ( “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation” OR “Advanced life support” OR “Cardiac arrest” OR “In-hospital Cardiac arrest” OR IHCA AND ( “Neurological outcome” OR “success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation” OR “Survival to discharge” OR “Favorable neurological outcome” ) 2. TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Cardiopulmonary resuscitation” OR “In-hospital Cardiac arrest” OR “Neurological outcome” OR “success rate of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation” OR “Survival to discharge” OR “Favorable neurological outcome” AND (sex OR gender OR “duration of resuscitation” OR shockable OR “non-shockable”) |
References
- 1.Kouwenhoven WB, Jude JR, Knickerbocker GG. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA. 1960;173:1064–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.1960.03020280004002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366–S468. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ebell MH, Afonso AM. Pre-arrest predictors of failure to survive after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 2011;28(5):505–15. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schneider AP 2nd, Nelson DJ, Brown DD. In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a 30-year review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993;6(2):91–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(1):63–81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, Ruwaard D, Satariano WA, van den Bos GA. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(7):661–74. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00363-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430–9. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(3):255–63. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.3.m255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hirlekar G, Karlsson T, Aune S, Ravn-Fischer A, Albertsson P, Herlitz J, et al. Survival and neurological outcome in the elderly after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;118:101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goodarzi A, Jalali A, Almasi A, Naderipour A, Kalhorii RP, Khodadadi A. Study of survival rate after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in hospitals of Kermanshah in 2013. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;7(1):52–8. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nolan JP, Berg RA, Andersen LW, Bhanji F, Chan PS, Donnino MW, et al. Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Template for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Consensus Report From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia) Resuscitation. 2019;144:166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shao F, Li CS, Liang LR, Qin J, Ding N, Fu Y, et al. Incidence and outcome of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in Beijing, China. Resuscitation. 2016;102:51–6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Movahedi A, Kavosi A, Behnam Vashani H, Mohammadi G, Mehrad Majd H, et al. 24 hour survival rate and its determinants in patients with successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Ghaem Hospital of Mashhad. J Neyshabur Univ Med Sci. 2016;3(4):56–63. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bergum D, Nordseth T, Mjølstad OC, Skogvoll E, Haugen BO. Causes of in-hospital cardiac arrest - incidences and rate of recognition. Resuscitation. 2015;87:63–8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Salari A, Mohammadnejad E, Vanaki Z, Ahmadi F. Survival rate and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Iranian Journal of Critical Care Nursing. 2010;3(2):45–9. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Welbourn C, Efstathiou N. How does the length of cardiopulmonary resuscitation affect brain damage in patients surviving cardiac arrest? A systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0476-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bossaert LL, Perkins GD, Askitopoulou H, Raffay VI, Greif R, Haywood KL, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 11 The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. Resuscitation. 2015;95:302–11. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mancini ME, Diekema DS, Hoadley TA, Kadlec KD, Leveille MH, McGowan JE, et al. Part 3: Ethical Issues: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S383–96. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res. 2020;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meaney PA, Nadkarni VM, Kern KB, Indik JH, Halperin HR, Berg RA. Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):101–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b43282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hessulf F, Karlsson T, Lundgren P, Aune S, Strömsöe A, Södersved Källestedt ML, et al. Factors of importance to 30-day survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden - A population-based register study of more than 18,000 cases. Int J Cardiol. 2018;255:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Johnson S, Nileshwar A. Initial rhythm and outcome of in-hospital adult cardiac arrest in a tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Respiratory Care. 2014;3(1):421. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Radeschi G, Mina A, Berta G, Fassiola A, Roasio A, Urso F, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in Italy: a multicentre observational study in the Piedmont Region. Resuscitation. 2017;119:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Urberg M, Ways C. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for an in-hospital cardiac arrest. J Fam Pract. 1987;25(1):41–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hjalmarsson P, Memar M, Geara SJ, Bouzereau M, Allberg A, Elgadi A, et al. Trends in co-morbidities and survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest -A Swedish cohort study. Resuscitation. 2018;124:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Løfgren B, Kirkegaard H, Granfeldt A. Adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark. Resuscitation. 2019;140:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lundin A, Rylander C, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Lundgren P. Adrenaline, ROSC and survival in patients resuscitated from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019;140:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cicekci F, Uca AU, Kara I, Kara I. A Study of Cerebral Performance Categories Based on Initial Rhythm and Resuscitation Time Following In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a State Hospital in Turkey. Hospital Practices and Research. 2018;3(2):44–9. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rohlin O, Taeri T, Netzereab S, Ullemark E, Djärv T. Duration of CPR and impact on 30-day survival after ROSC for in-hospital cardiac arrest-A Swedish cohort study. Resuscitation. 2018;132:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nadkarni VM, Larkin GL, Peberdy MA, Carey SM, Kaye W, Mancini ME, et al. First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults. JAMA. 2006;295(1):50–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qvick A, Radif M, Brever C, Myrvik JO, Schenk Gustafsson K, Djärv T. Survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest in men and women in a large Swedish cohort. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0576-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Heller RF, Steele PL, Fisher JD, Alexander HM, Dobson AJ. Success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation after heart attack in hospital and outside hospital. BMJ. 1995;311(7016):1332–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kung C-T, Cheng H-H, Hung S-C, Li C-J, Liu C-F, Chen F-C, et al. Outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in adult general wards. International Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2014;5(19):1228. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jones P, Miles J, Mitchell N. Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest in Auckland City Hospital. Emerg Med Australas. 2011;23(5):569–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tok D, Keleş GT, Toprak V, Topcu I. Assessment of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation using Utstein template in a university hospital. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2004;202(4):265–73. doi: 10.1620/tjem.202.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Khatib J, Schwartz N, Bisharat N. Twenty Year Trends of Survival after In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017;19(12):756–760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Agerström J, Carlsson M, Bremer A, Herlitz J, Rawshani A, Årestedt K, et al. Treatment and survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: does patient ethnicity matter? Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021:zvab079. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thomas RD, Waites JH, Hubbard WN, Wicks M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a district general hospital: increased success over 7 years. Arch Emerg Med. 1990;7(3):200–5. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wachira BW, Tyler MD. Characterization of in-hospital cardiac arrest in adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Kenya. African Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015;5(2):70–4. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Widestedt H, Giesecke J, Karlsson P, Jakobsson JG. In-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation performed by the hospital emergency team: A 6-year retrospective register analysis at Danderyd University Hospital, Sweden. F1000Res. 2018;7:1013. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15373.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang CH, Huang CH, Chang WT, Tsai MS, Yu PH, Wu YW, et al. Associations among gender, marital status, and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2016;107:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rakić D, Rumboldt Z, Carević V, Bagatin J, Polić S, Pivac N, et al. In-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation outcomes: rationale for sudden cardiac death approach. Croat Med J. 2005;46(6):907–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chua J, Lin Z, Tan J, Surentheran S, Iskander MHB, Leong B. Predictors of return of spontaneous circulation and survival in in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study in a single institution. Critical Care. 2015;19(1):1–201. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Garry J, Nguyen R, Schoenfeld E, Parnia S, Patel J. Impact of Gender on Clinical Outcomes in Adults With In-hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2015;132(suppl_3):A18700–A. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chong S, Brenner N, Benz P, Woo S, Wilson M, Titus S, et al. Characteristics of patients with sudden in hospital cardiac arrest with a shockable initial rhythm in a system with mature rapid response and code blue teams. Circulation. 2018;138(Suppl_2):A259–A. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Saklayen M, Liss H, Markert R. In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation Survival in 1 hospital and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995;74(4):163–75. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199507000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Skrifvars MB, Saarinen K, Ikola K, Kuisma M. Improved survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest outside critical care areas. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49(10):1534–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yokoyama H, Yonemoto N, Yonezawa K, Fuse J, Shimizu N, Hayashi T, et al. Report from the Japanese registry of CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest (J-RCPR) Circ J. 2011;75(4):815–22. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-11-0136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Topjian AA, Localio AR, Berg RA, Alessandrini EA, Meaney PA, Pepe PE, et al. Women of child-bearing age have better inhospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes than do equal-aged men. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(5):1254–60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8ca43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.DeVoe B, Roth A, Maurer G, Tamuz M, Lesser M, Pekmezaris R, et al. Correlation of the predictive ability of early warning metrics and mortality for cardiac arrest patients receiving in-hospital Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. Heart Lung. 2016;45(6):497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Herlitz J, Rundqvist S, Bång A, Aune S, Lundström G, Ekström L, et al. Is there a difference between women and men in characteristics and outcome after in hospital cardiac arrest? Resuscitation. 2001;49(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ohlsson MA, Kennedy LM, Juhlin T, Melander O. Evaluation of pre-arrest morbidity score and prognosis after resuscitation score and other clinical variables associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest in southern Sweden. Resuscitation. 2014;85(10):1370–4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Parikh PB, Malhotra A, Qadeer A, Patel JK. Impact of Sex on Survival and Neurologic Outcomes in Adults With In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(3):309–312. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Al-Dury N, Rawshani A, Israelsson J, Strömsöe A, Aune S, Agerström J, et al. Characteristics and outcome among 14,933 adult cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide study with the emphasis on gender and age. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(12):1839–1844. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Goldberger ZD, Chan PS, Berg RA, Kronick SL, Cooke CR, Lu M, et al. Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study. Lancet. 2012;380(9852):1473–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60862-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Israelsson J, Persson C, Strömberg A, Arestedt K. Is there a difference in survival between men and women suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest? Heart Lung. 2014;43(6):510–5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Li H, Wu TT, Liu PC, Liu XS, Mu Y, Guo YS, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in adults hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome in China. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(7):1301–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ravipragasam S, Chandar D, Pandit VR, Cheriyan A. Survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest at emergency department and its associated factors: a prospective observational study. Journal of Acute Disease. 2019;8(5):185. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Islamlo F. Quality and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in imam Khomeini teaching hospital-report according to Utstein style. Studies in Medical Sciences. 2011;22(4):346–52. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jaberi Y, Changizian L, Mazlomzadeh S. Predictors of outcome in in-hospital cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 2011;19(75):48–57. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Möhnle P, Huge V, Polasek J, Weig I, Atzinger R, Kreimeier U, et al. Survival after cardiac arrest and changing task profile of the cardiac arrest team in a tertiary care center. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:294512. doi: 10.1100/2012/294512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, Gwinnutt C, Parrott F, Power S, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014;85(8):987–92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.D’Arrigo S, Cacciola S, Dennis M, Jung C, Kagawa E, Antonelli M, et al. Predictors of favourable outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2017;121:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bougouin W, Mustafic H, Marijon E, Murad MH, Dumas F, Barbouttis A, et al. Gender and survival after sudden cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;94:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kim C, Fahrenbruch CE, Cobb LA, Eisenberg MS. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in men and women. Circulation. 2001;104(22):2699–703. doi: 10.1161/hc4701.099784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pell JP, Sirel J, Marsden AK, Cobbe SM. Sex differences in outcome following community-based cardiopulmonary arrest. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(3):239–44. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Perers E, Abrahamsson P, Bång A, Engdahl J, Lindqvist J, Karlson BW, et al. There is a difference in characteristics and outcome between women and men who suffer out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 1999;40(3):133–40. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.McCullough LD, Hurn PD. Estrogen and ischemic neuroprotection: an integrated view. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(5):228–35. doi: 10.1016/s1043-2760(03)00076-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Noppens RR, Kofler J, Grafe MR, Hurn PD, Traystman RJ. Estradiol after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation is neuroprotective and mediated through estrogen receptor-beta. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29(2):277–86. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Schultz SC, Cullinane DC, Pasquale MD, Magnant C, Evans SR. Predicting in-hospital mortality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1996;33(1):13–7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)00986-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ballew KA, Philbrick JT, Caven DE, Schorling JB. Predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A moving target. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(21):2426–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bedell SE, Delbanco TL, Cook EF, Epstein FH. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. New England journal of medicine. 1983;309(10):569–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198309083091001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]