. 2022 Dec 17;85:103503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103503

Table 3.

EFAS matrix of KM implementation in disaster and pandemic conditions.

OPPORTUNITIES (O)	THREATS (T)
O1: The state of Indonesia is a country with a distinctive style of knowledge in the society O2: Projects from development partners produce many modules and other documents (e.g., disaster risk assessment) O3: Support from various Donor Institutions to apply KM practices in disaster management O4: The Indonesian ethnic group is very diverse, with great potential for tacit knowledge that can strengthen KM O5: There is great enthusiasm from disaster activists to use KM as an instrument for improving disaster management in the future.	T1: The nature of the disaster (i.e., repeated and unpredictable occurrences) means that there is no time to manage knowledge T2: The manual KM process will always lag behind because explicit knowledge of disasters in Indonesia is growing fast, and tacit knowledge has not been well codified to date T3: The community has other, more important and pressing, issues to deal with T4: It is difficult for the community to follow the development of disaster-related knowledge T5: Knowledge of disasters can be lost by the community because of their influence is over a long period of time T6: The KM system is not yet robust and systematic T7: There is no effective strategy to motivate KM stakeholders in order that they carry out their respective roles.

OPPORTUNITIES (O)

THREATS (T)

O1: The state of Indonesia is a country with a distinctive style of knowledge in the society
O2: Projects from development partners produce many modules and other documents (e.g., disaster risk assessment)
O3: Support from various Donor Institutions to apply KM practices in disaster management
O4: The Indonesian ethnic group is very diverse, with great potential for tacit knowledge that can strengthen KM
O5: There is great enthusiasm from disaster activists to use KM as an instrument for improving disaster management in the future.

T1: The nature of the disaster (i.e., repeated and unpredictable occurrences) means that there is no time to manage knowledge
T2: The manual KM process will always lag behind because explicit knowledge of disasters in Indonesia is growing fast, and tacit knowledge has not been well codified to date
T3: The community has other, more important and pressing, issues to deal with
T4: It is difficult for the community to follow the development of disaster-related knowledge
T5: Knowledge of disasters can be lost by the community because of their influence is over a long period of time
T6: The KM system is not yet robust and systematic
T7: There is no effective strategy to motivate KM stakeholders in order that they carry out their respective roles.