Table 2.
RE-AIM indicators with the number and percent of studies (N = 31) reporting each indicator
| Individual (Participant)-Level | # Studies Reporting | % Studies Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | ||
| Participation rate | 12 | 39 |
| Representativeness | 5 | 16 |
| Sample size | 31 | 100 |
| Description of intended audience | 31 | 100 |
| Inclusion criteria | 27 | 87 |
| Exclusion criteria | 21 | 68 |
| Number of eligible exposed to recruitment | 16 | 52 |
| Participant attendance/completion | 10 | 32 |
| Method to identify intended audience | 24 | 77 |
| Description of recruitment methods used | 20 | 65 |
| Used qualitative methods to describe reach | 2 | 7 |
| Core indicator reporting | 52 | |
| Overall reach reporting | 54 | |
| Efficacy/effectiveness | ||
| Breastfeeding outcomes | 28 | 90 |
| Quality of life | 0 | 0 |
| Unintended negative consequences | 1 | 3 |
| Attrition | 20 | 65 |
| Type of analysis | 16 | 52 |
| Cost effectiveness | 2 | 7 |
| Used qualitative methods to describe effectiveness | 9 | 29 |
| Core indicator reporting | 31 | |
| Overall efficacy/effectiveness reporting | 35 | |
| Maintenance | ||
| Individual level maintenance | 5 | 16 |
| Attrition at follow-up | 6 | 19 |
| Use of qualitative methods to describe individual level maintenance | 2 | 7 |
| Core indicator reporting | 18 | |
| Overall maintenance reporting | 14 | |
| Setting Level | ||
| Adoption | ||
| Number of participating sites | 18 | 58 |
| Site participation rate | 5 | 16 |
| Site representativeness | 1 | 3 |
| Number of staff that agreed to deliver intervention | 5 | 16 |
| Staff participation rate | 1 | 3 |
| Staff representativeness | 0 | 0 |
| Description of intended settings | 11 | 36 |
| Description of intervention locations | 9 | 29 |
| Method to identify settings | 6 | 19 |
| Site level inclusion/exclusion criteria | 2 | 7 |
| Number of eligible and invited sites | 8 | 26 |
| Method to identify delivery staff | 6 | 19 |
| Number of staff eligible and invited to participate | 0 | 0 |
| Staff level inclusion/exclusion criteria | 2 | 7 |
| Level of delivery staff expertise | 21 | 68 |
| Characteristics of staff | 5 | 16 |
| Cost of adoption | 1 | 3 |
| Used qualitative methods to describe adoption | 3 | 10 |
| Core indicator reporting | 16 | |
| Overall adoption reporting | 19 | |
| Implementation | ||
| Adherence to intervention protocol | 6 | 19 |
| Measure of cost | 3 | 10 |
| Intervention description | 30 | 98 |
| Intervention duration | 27 | 87 |
| Number of intervention contacts | 26 | 84 |
| Timing of intervention contacts | 25 | 81 |
| Description of theory or principles used to develop the intervention | 10 | 32 |
| Consistency of implementation | 3 | 10 |
| Use of qualitative methods to describe implementation | 3 | 10 |
| Core indicator reporting | 15 | |
| Overall implementation reporting | 48 | |
| Maintenance | ||
| Description of program continuation post study | 4 | 13 |
| Description of integration into delivery system | 1 | 3 |
| Use of qualitative methods to describe organizational level maintenance | 0 | 0 |
| Ongoing maintenance costs | 1 | 3 |
| Core indicator reporting | 13 | |
| Overall maintenance reporting | 5 | |
Italicized items reflect core indicators based on the RE-AIM framework