Table 6.
Results of mediation analysis.
AP → ARO → PLS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | p | LLCI | ULCI | |
AP → ARO | .12 | .07 | 5.21 | .00 | .007 | .284 |
AP → PLS | .06 | .02 | 3.02 | .00 | .051 | .380 |
ARO → PLS | .11 | .04 | 3.66 | .00 | .019 | .251 |
Total effect of AP → PLS |
.17 |
.06 |
2.89 |
.00 |
.080 |
.310 |
ARO → PLS → CUI | ||||||
Β |
SE |
t |
p |
LLCI |
ULCI |
|
ARO → PLS | .26 | .02 | 13.02 | .00 | .068 | .421 |
ARO → CUI | .09 | .02 | 4.42 | .00 | .028 | .182 |
PLS → CUI | .11 | .04 | 3.66 | .00 | .019 | .251 |
Total effect of ARO → CUI | .16 | .04 | 4.03 | .00 | .071 | .289 |
Note: Aesthetic appeal = AP, Arousal = ARO, Pleasure = PLS, Continued usage intentions = CUI.