Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;62:102595. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102595

Table 6.

Results of mediation analysis.

AP → ARO → PLS
β SE t p LLCI ULCI
AP → ARO .12 .07 5.21 .00 .007 .284
AP → PLS .06 .02 3.02 .00 .051 .380
ARO → PLS .11 .04 3.66 .00 .019 .251
Total effect of AP → PLS
.17
.06
2.89
.00
.080
.310
ARO → PLS → CUI

Β
SE
t
p
LLCI
ULCI
ARO → PLS .26 .02 13.02 .00 .068 .421
ARO → CUI .09 .02 4.42 .00 .028 .182
PLS → CUI .11 .04 3.66 .00 .019 .251
Total effect of ARO → CUI .16 .04 4.03 .00 .071 .289

Note: Aesthetic appeal = AP, Arousal = ARO, Pleasure = PLS, Continued usage intentions = CUI.