Table 1.
Optimization for Rh(III)-catalyzed DKR-ATH of 1aa
| entry | catalyst | Hydrogen donor | Solvent | conv. (%) | eeanti (%) | eesyn (%) | dr (anti/syn) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | (R,R)-cat.1 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | <5 | – | – | – |
| 2 | (S,S)-cat.2 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | <5 | – | – | – |
| 3 | (S,S)-cat.3 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | 23 | 84 | – | 84:16 |
| 4 | (R,R)-cat.4 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | 99 | −96 | – | 90:10 |
| 5 | (R,R)-cat.5 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | 90 | −95 | – | 92:8 |
| 6 | (R,R)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | 84 | −96 | – | 95:5 |
| 7 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | MeOH | 85 | 96 | – | 95:5 |
| 8 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | hexane | <5 | – | – | – |
| 9 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | EtOH | 71 | 93 | – | 97:3 |
| 10 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | DCM | 66 | 95 | – | 93:7 |
| 11 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | THF | 81 | 99 | – | 96:4 |
| 12 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | dioxane | 97 | 99 | – | 93:7 |
| 13 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | toluene | >99 | 95 | – | 98:2 |
| 14 | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (5:2) | EtOAc | >99 | 99 | – | 98:2 |
| 15b | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (2:0.02) | EtOAc | >99 | – | 96 | 2:98 |
| 16c | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2H:Et3N (2:0) | EtOAc | >99 | – | 93 | <1:99 |
| 17d | (S,S)-cat.6 | iPrOH | iPrOH | <5 | – | – | – |
| 18e | (S,S)-cat.6 | HCO2Na | iPrOH | <5 | – | – | – |
aConditions: Catalyst/1a (0.1 mmol) ratio of 1:50 in 1 mL of solvent, HCO2H/Et3N azeotropic mixture (20 μL) at 25 °C for 12 h. Conversions (conv.) were determined by 1H NMR analysis. Enantiomeric excesses (ee) and diastereomeric ratios (dr) were determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral stationary phase.
bHCO2H (2.0 equiv.) was used.
cHCO2H (2.0 equiv.) was used for 48 h.
dKOtBu (3.0 equiv.) was used in 1.0 mL of iPrOH at 60 °C for 12 h.
eHCO2Na (5.0 equiv.) was used in 2.0 mL of iPrOH /H2O (1.0 mL/1.0 mL) at 60 °C for 12 h.