Table 4.
Logistic regression model of mode switching from public transport to car.
| Variables | Coefficient | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant term | −2.755 | 0.001 | |
| Gender and age | Male | 1.682 | 0.032 |
| Age |
−0.632 |
0.043 |
|
| Monthly income (₹) and employment | 15,000–30,000 | 0.983 | 0.011 |
| 30,000–45,000 | 0.861 | 0.046 | |
| 45,000–75,000 | 0.896 | 0.042 | |
| More than 75,000 | 1.964 | 0.031 | |
| Ref: Less than 15000 | |||
| Student | −0.774 | 0.082 | |
| Ref: Employed |
|||
| Trip frequency | Trip frequency: once a month | −0.236 | 0.321 |
| Trip frequency: once a week | 0.368 | 0.152 | |
| Trip frequency: 3–5 times a week | 0.541 | 0.067 | |
| Trip frequency: Daily | 0.888 | 0.040 | |
| Ref: no trip |
|||
| Access distance to PT services (m) | Access distance: 500-1000 | 0.242 | 0.063 |
| Access distance: 1000-2000 | 0.495 | 0.019 | |
| Access distance: 2000-3000 | 0.512 | 0.015 | |
| Access distance: greater than 3000 | 0.432 | 0.021 | |
| Ref: Access distance: less than 500 |
|||
| Travel time (minutes) | Travel time: 15-30 | 1.642 | 0.043 |
| Travel time: 30-45 | 1.856 | 0.041 | |
| Travel time: greater than 45 | 2.020 | 0.035 | |
| Ref: Travel time: less than 15 |
|||
| Household access to cars | 2.015 | <0.001 | |
| Factors encouraging users in choosing cars over PT | Travel time | ||
| Travel time: important | 1.493 | 0.007 | |
| Travel time: very important | 1.621 | 0.012 | |
| Ref: Travel time: not important | |||
| Cost | |||
| Cost: important | 0.127 | 0.087 | |
| Cost: very important | 0.236 | 0.078 | |
| Ref: Cost: not important | |||
| Safety | |||
| Safety: important | −0.487 | 0.308 | |
| Safety: very important | −0.442 | 0.381 | |
| Ref: Safety: not important | |||
| Overcrowding | |||
| Crowd: important | 0.924 | 0.028 | |
| Crowd: very important | 1.196 | 0.006 | |
| Ref: Crowd: not important | |||
| Hygiene | |||
| Hygiene: important | 0.617 | 0.042 | |
| Hygiene: very important | 0.819 | 0.037 | |
| Ref: Hygiene: not important | |||