Table 7.
Hypothesis | Path | Standardised path coefficient (β) | t-Value | P-Value | Test result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | COM to RLT-VAL | 0.36 | 5.81 | *** | Yes |
H2 | TRU to RLT-VAL | 0.23 | 4.01 | *** | Yes |
H3 | TRU to COM | 0.37 | 7.65 | *** | Yes |
H4 | SUS to RLT-VAL | 0.10 | 1.97 | * | Yes |
H5 | SUS to COM | 0.17 | 3.66 | *** | Yes |
H6 | SUS to TRU | −0.11 | −2.14 | * | Yes |
Control variables | Product type a | −0.03 | −0.58 | >0.05 | — |
Product nature b | 0.01 | 0.30 | >0.05 | — | |
Product value c | −0.10 | −1.89 | >0.05 | — |
Model fit statistics: χ2 = 139.68, df = 71, χ2/df = 1.97, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, IFI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.05, RMSEA = 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
a Product type is coded as a categorical variable with ‘1′ representing utilitarian products and ‘−1′ representing hedonic products.
b Product nature is coded as a categorical variable with ‘1′ representing durable products and ‘−1′ representing perishable products.
c Product value is coded as a categorical variable with ‘1′ representing low-value products and ‘−1′ representing high-value products.