Table 2.
Dynamics of fermentation characteristics of alfalfa silage inoculated with lactobacillus.
| Item1 | Ensiling days | Treatment2 | SEM3 | Significances4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | LCO | LCA | LPL | LPE | D | T | D × T | |||
| pH | 7 | 5.47b | 5.61a | 5.43b | 5.61a | 4.89e | 0.03 | *** | *** | *** |
| 15 | 5.45b | 5.39bc | 5.57ab | 5.53ab | 4.87e | |||||
| 60 | 5.35bc | 5.19d | 5.30c | 5.32bc | 4.87e | |||||
| Ammonia-N (g/kg TN) | 7 | 77.7c | 96.8b | 78.6c | 84.5bc | 35.1e | 3.85 | *** | *** | ** |
| 15 | 112ab | 104ab | 109ab | 111ab | 62.2d | |||||
| 60 | 120a | 109ab | 119a | 121a | 66.8cd | |||||
| Lactic acid (g/kg DM) | 7 | 16.5e | 14.5ef | 16.0e | 12.7f | 26.2b | 1.01 | *** | *** | *** |
| 15 | 20.3d | 22.7c | 18.5de | 21.0cd | 31.7a | |||||
| 60 | 18.4de | 26.7b | 21.0cd | 21.7cd | 31.4a | |||||
| Acetic acid (g/kg DM) | 7 | 19.9f | 25.1d | 22.5e | 28.8c | 16.3g | 0.88 | *** | *** | ns |
| 15 | 27.1cd | 30.5b | 30.6b | 32.7ab | 19.9f | |||||
| 60 | 29.6bc | 31.5b | 31.3b | 34.3a | 23.2de | |||||
| Propionic acid (g/kg DM) | 7 | 0.38d | 0.37d | 0.38d | 0.40d | 0.42d | ||||
| 15 | 1.53a | 1.27b | 1.23bc | 0.98c | 1.00c | 0.04 | *** | * | *** | |
| 60 | 1.58a | 1.25bc | 1.27b | 1.30b | 1.49ab | |||||
| Lactic acid / acetic acid | 7 | 0.83c | 0.58d | 0.71cd | 0.44e | 1.60a | 0.12 | ns | *** | ** |
| 15 | 0.75cd | 0.74cd | 0.61d | 0.64d | 1.59a | |||||
| 60 | 0.63d | 0.85c | 0.67cd | 0.63d | 1.34b | |||||
DM, dry matter; TN, total nitrogen. Butyric acid was not detected.
C, control; LCO, Lactobacillus coryniformis; LCA, Lactobacillus casei; LPL, Lactobacillus plantarum; LPE, Lactobacillus pentosus.
SEM, standard error of means.
D, ensiling days; T, inoculum treatments; D × T, the interaction between ensiling days and inoculum treatments.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Means with different letters in the same analysis indicated a significant difference ns, not significant.