Skip to main content
. 2022 May 26;11(24):4756–4766. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4802

TABLE 2.

Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis Models predicting Biochemical recurrence‐free survival, Distant metastasis‐free survival, and Overall survival following EBRT treatment (n = 405 a c )

Patient characteristic Biochemical recurrence‐free survival (BRFS) Distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) Overall survival (OS)
HR (95% CI) p‐value HR (95% CI) p‐value HR (95% CI) p‐value
Age at EBRT (years) 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.84 0.98 (0.9, 1.1) 0.64 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.001
Prostate volume b (cubic centimeters, cc) NA NA NA NA
28.4–36.4 vs. <28.4 1.8 (0.6, 5.8) 0.31
36.5–48.06 vs. <28.4 2.5 (0.8, 7.8) 0.13
≥48.07 vs. <28.4 4.2 (1.3, 13.9) 0.02
Self‐reported race
African American vs. Caucasian American 1.3 (0.6, 2.7) 0.58 2.3 (0.6, 9) 0.24 1.3 (0.8, 2) 0.29
NCCN risk stratum
Favorable‐Intermediate vs. Low 1.1 (0.5, 2.3) 0.84 4.2 (1.1, 16.3) 0.04 1.6 (1.1, 2.4) 0.016
PSA Nadir (ng/ml)
≥0.2 vs. <0.2 4.3 (1.7, 10.6) 0.002 1.6 (0.3, 8.5) 0.56 1.1 (0.7, 1.6) 0.82
Time to PSA nadir c (years)
<2.3 vs. ≤2.3 4.9 (2.3, 10.5) <0.001 0.8 (0.2, 3.8) 0.76 1.7 (1.2, 2.5) 0.004
PSADT (months)
≥10 vs. No BCR NA NA 2.8 (0.6, 13.9) 0.20 NA NA
<10 vs. No BCR 33.9 (4.1, 277.5) 0.001
Major comorbidities
Yes vs. No 2.1 (1.4, 3.1) <0.001
a

Exclusion of study subjects was made for the following reasons: receipt of secondary HT (n = 68), missing PSA nadir or missing prostate volume information (n = 33).

b

The model was also adjusted for primary treatment year, primary treatment type, and primary treatment technique.

c

Time to PSA nadir was categorized using the median split for time from RT to PSA nadir (in years).

Bold indicates significant values of p < 0.05.