Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Nov 23;34(12):E873–E878. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00268

Table 1.

Patient characteristics by clopidogrel response.

Characteristics All Patients (n = 515) Responders (n = 268) Non-Responders (n = 247) P-Valuea
Adenosine diphosphate group <.001
≤40% 268 (52.0%) 268 (100%) 0 (0.0%)
40%−50% 68 (13.2%) 0 (0.0%) 68 (27.5%)
>50% 179 (34.8%) 0 (0.0%) 179 (72.5%)
Arachidonic acid (%) 15.0 (9.0–27.0) 11.0 (7.0–17.0) 21.0 (13.0–30.0) <.001
Arachidonic acid ≤20% 337 (65.4%) 216 (80.6%) 121 (49.0%) <.001
Time from clopidogrel load to lab measurement (hours) 32.0 (20.7–64.6) 32.0 (21.1–66.3) 29.7 (20.4–63.0) .64
Time from clopidogrel load to lab measurement by group .64
<24 hours 183 (38.0%) 92 (36.1%) 91 (40.1%)
24–48 hours 161 (33.4%) 74 (29.0%) 64 (28.2%)
>48 hours 138 (28.6%) 89 (34.9%) 72 (31.7%)
Clopidogrel load strength .23
300 mg 172 (33.5%) 93 (34.8%) 79 (32.0%)
600 mg 310 (60.3%) 162 (60.7%) 148 (59.9%)
No load 32 (6.2%) 12 (4.5%) 20 (8.1%)
Targeted temperature management when loaded 9 (1.8%) 2 (0.7%) 7 (2.8%)
Clopidogrel manufacturer .01
Manufacturer 1 23 (8.6%) 43 (17.4%)
Manufacturer 2 38 (14.2%) 31 (12.6%)
Unknown manufacturer 206 (77.2%) 173 (70.0%)

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (%).

a

P-values for comparison between responders and non-responders.