Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 May 3;41(2):126–139. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2022.2070320

Table 3:

Comparison of Indirect Calorimetry to Established Resting Energy Expenditure Equations

Resting Energy Expenditure (kcal/day) % Difference* p-value MUE (kcal/day) MOE (kcal/day) r
Mean ± SD Range
Indirect Calorimetry 1,643.3 ±395.9 619, 2,794 --- --- --- ---
Equation
Harris-Benedict 1,610.0 ±278.5 1,232.1, 2,578.2 1.4% 0.41 -915.0 724.4 0.78
Mifflin 1,509.3 ±261.7 1,100.4, 2,289.9 −5.1% <0.001 −1033.3 695.7 0.78
Owens 1,602.1 ±265.1 1,292.0, 2,415.1 1.2% 0.30 −821.3 919.7 0.75
WHO/FAU/UNU 1,670.0 ±249.9 1,322.8, 2,520.0 5.6% 0.49 −859.4 801.6 0.78
SECA 1,595.8 ±244.9 1,276, 2,703 1.4% <0.001 −941 889 0.72

All values are represented as means ± standard deviation, range, or % difference

*

represents the difference between the gold standard (indirect calorimetry using ReeVue) and the equation used.

r – correlation coefficient

Abbreviations: MUE – Minimum Underestimation of Indirect vs. Equation; MOE – Maximum Overestimation of Indirect vs. Equation;WHO – World Health Organization; FAU – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; UNU – United Nations University