Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;42(49):9211–9226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0859-22.2022

Table 2.

Details of the three “Social” versus “Non-social” comparisons (based on observer reports) performed as part of the GLM analysis

Analysis Number “Social” responder group “Non-social” responder group Rationale for the analysis Statistical comparisons for fMRI ID of the analysis used in figures and text
1 RANDOM MECHANICAL (Within animation, between participant)
  • Controls for low-level input

  • Most ambiguous animation

Two-sample t test RANDOM MECH
2 COAXING BILLIARD
  • Likely similar decision times during animation (as estimatedfrom online RT experiment)

Paired t test COAXING-BILLIARD
(Between animation, within participant)
3 All “Social” All “Non-social”
  • Maximizes power by comparing all “Social” responses with all“Non-social” responses within participants

One-sample t test after averaging runwise estimates ALL ANIMATIONS
Coded 1 (“Social”) and −1 (“Non-social”), in runwise GLMs