Table 3.
Livelihood capital | Identified impacts of COVID-19 on fisheries and aquaculture |
Impacts of covid-19 on stakeholders |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fishers | Fish farmers | Fish traders | Fish auctioneers | ||
Natural | Reduced fishing disturbance temporarily in natural water body in early months of the pandemic | √ | × | × | × |
Increased fish culture period | × | √(85) | × | × | |
Reduced fish stocking in aqua-farms | × | √(45) | × | × | |
Aquaculture continued but at a reduced level | × | √ | × | × | |
Reduced fish supply in the market/auction centre | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Human | Children’s education hampered severely as schools were closed for long time | √(95) | √(90) | √(90) | √(50) |
Reduced food intake (three meals to two meals per day, mostly for the female household members) | √(70) | √(35) | × | × | |
Dramatically reduced nutritious food intake | √(60) | √ | × | × | |
Increased level of non-COVID-19 diseases | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Inadequate medical supports for household members | √ | √ | × | × | |
Insufficient foods and treatment for adolescences and pregnant women | √ | √ | √ | × | |
Increased level of mental stress for household members | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Lack of labour | × | × | × | √(35) | |
Physical | Selling of some physical assets to run the household | √(25) | √(15) | × | × |
Hardship in buying COVID-19 safety materials such as hand sanitiser, face masks, etc. due to financial crisis | √ | √ | √ | × | |
Had to provide increased amount of fish feed due to longer aquaculture period | × | √(80) | × | × | |
Halt of transport during early months of the pandemic | × | × | √(65) | √(65) | |
Financial | Reduced income from fish selling | √(100) | √(100) | √(60) | √(50) |
Reduced income from non-fisheries related activities | √ | × | √ | × | |
Debt increased and fell under debt cycle | √(35) | × | × | × | |
Extra money required for maintaining health guidelines and buying soap, hand sanitiser, masks and gloves | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Extra cost required to cultivate the unsold fish in ponds | × | √(80) | × | × | |
Increased cost for fish transportation | × | × | √(55) | × | |
Reduced income due to shortening of marketing hours | √ | × | √(50) | × | |
Commission decreased due to less supply of fish | × | × | × | √(20) | |
Social | Domestic violence on females increased to some extent | √(30) | √(30) | × | × |
More family quarrel | √(45) | × | × | × | |
More competition in fishing at later stage of COVID-19 due to return of factory workers to villages | √(35) | × | × | × | |
Less options for family entertainment | √ | × | × | × | |
Not able to meet extended family members and friends during the pandemic period | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Very hard to maintain physical distance on boat while fishing | √ | × | × | × | |
Reduced political activities | × | × | √ | √ | |
Institutional | More illegal fishing due to less patrolling | √(30) | × | × | × |
Disruption of normal activities of fisheries association | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Reduced connection with government offices | × | × | √ | √ |
*‘√’ means impacts have been reported; ‘×’ means impacts are not found; and percent responses of stakeholders in parenthesis.