Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 19;9:35. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00206-9

Table 2.

Sample description with parameters of network inference for N2

Measure Mean SD range Labelling in NA St-C Br-St R2
Sex 26.32% male Sex .3 .28 .74
Age 26.89 9.44 18—65 Age .36 .28 .14
PAI-BOR total 27.74 8.96 6—56
 affective instability 8.31 2.67 2 -16 PAI_AI .63 .00 .42
 identity disturbance 7.34 3.33 1- 15 PAI_ID 1.01 .44 .61
 negative relationships 8.25 2.86 2—16 PAI_NR .68 .23 .46
 self-harm 3.84 2.28 1—13 PAI_SH .54 .16 .32
CTQ total 50.25 13.87 30—107
 emotional abuse 11.91 5.87 5—25 CTQ_EA 1.33 .90 .66
 physical abuse 8.73 4.19 5—25 CTQ_PA .81 .00 .38
 sexual abuse 6.67 3.94 4—20 CTQ_SA .55 .08 .26
 emotional neglect 14.76 3.71 6 -25 CTQ_EN .46 .21 .32
 physical neglect 8.17 1.97 4—18 CTQ_PN .17 .00 .05
AAS
 attachment closeness 19.48 5.82 6 – 30 AAS_C .52 .08 .45
 attachment dependence 16.70 5.46 6 – 30 AAS_D 1.41 .66 .68
 attachment anxiety 19.23 6.75 6 – 30 AAS_A .89 .57 .64
MSPSS total 62.75 16.07 12 – 84
 social support family 19.36 7.50 4 – 28 SS_FA .96 .71 .54
 social support friends 21.22 6.23 4 – 28 SS_FR .62 .26 .39
 social support significant other 28.00 6.53 4 – 28 SS_SO .62 .20 .28

n = 1102; NA Network Analysis, St-C Strength Centrality, Br-St Bridge Strength, R2 Predictability