Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Nov 10;21(10):1403–1413. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1836262

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Panels A-D depict the relationships among each subject’s change in MUAPAMP-RTNORM slope and change in MUAPAMP-RTABS slope versus change in mCSA in the (A and B) EX group and (C and D) CON group. Panels E-H depict the relationships among each subject’s change in MUAPAMP-RTNORM slope and change in MUAPAMP-RTABS slope versus change in whole leg skeletal muscle mass (SMMRL) in the (E and F) EX group and (G and H) CON group. Solid dark grey regression lines (with 95% confidence intervals) indicate a strong, significant relationship. Dashed dark grey regression lines indicate a moderate to strong, but non-significant relationship (0.05 > p ≤ 0.10). Dotted light grey lines indicate small, non-significant relationships.