Table 4.

Results of the models predicting youth resilience and well-being (n = 92)

Outcome variable	Resilience				Well-being
Support type	Informal support		Formal support		Informal support		Formal support
	β (SE)	p	β (SE)	p	β (SE)	p	β (SE)	p
Model 2
Pandemic-related stress	− 0.11 (0.11)	.330	− 0.14 (0.11)	.195	− 0.18 (0.09)	.035	− 0.20 (0.09)	.030
Support (dichotomous)	0.92 (0.20)	.000	0.11 (0.15)	.456	0.70 (0.34)	.040	0.16 (0.15)	.268
Support (continuous)	1.14 (0.20)	.000	0.53 (0.13)	.000	0.84 (0.24)	.015	0.33 (0.14)	.022
Living situation	− 0.25 (0.10)	.011	− 0.24 (0.10)	.016	− 0.27 (0.11)	.017	− 0.27 (0.11)	.019
Treatment condition	0.35 (0.12)	.003	0.36 (0.12)	.002	0.27 (0.12)	.019	0.26 (0.12)	.033
Gender	–	–	–	–	− 0.43 (0.12)	.000	− 0.40 (0.13)	.002
Model 3
Pandemic-related stress	− 0.11 (0.11)	.333	− 0.14 (0.10)	.174	− 0.18 (0.09)	.035	− 0.20 (0.09)	.029
Support (dichotomous)	0.90 (0.20)	.000	0.08 (0.15)	.598	0.70 (0.34)	.040	0.16 (0.14)	.270
Support (continuous)	1.11 (0.19)	.000	0.52 (0.13)	.000	0.84 (0.35)	.015	0.33 (0.15)	.022
Stress × Support (continuous)	0.06 (0.07)	.413	0.19 (0.09)	.029	− 0.01 (0.07)	.934	0.01 (0.07)	.863
Living situation	− 0.25 (0.10)	.013	− 0.24 (0.10)	.017	− 0.27 (0.11)	.016	− 0.27 (0.11)	.020
Treatment condition	0.35 (0.11)	.002	0.36 (0.11)	.001	0.27 (0.12)	.019	0.26 (0.12)	.032
Gender	–	–	–	–	− 0.41 (0.13)	.001	− 0.40 (0.13)	.002