Table 3.
Artifacts Grouped by Patient Using the Optimized Algorithm Parameters in Table 2
| Patient | True Artifacts (n) | Algorithm “Artifacts” (n) | Coverage (n [%]) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 (100) |
| 2 | 11 | 27 | 11 (100) |
| 3 | 16 | 343 | 16 (100) |
| 4 | 3 | 11 | 3 (100) |
| 5 | 1 | 19 | 1 (100) |
| 6 | 20 | 28 | 18 (90) |
| 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 (100) |
| 8 | 4 | 10 | 3 (75) |
| 9 | 2 | 5 | 2 (100) |
| 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 (100) |
| 11 | 4 | 15 | 4 (100) |
| 12 | 9 | 16 | 9 (100) |
| 13 | 41 | 154 | 41 (100) |
| 14 | 3 | 6 | 3 (100) |
| 15 | 0 | 4 | - |
Coverage represents the number of true artifacts also identified by the algorithm. Manual cleaning resulted in the identification and removal of 119 artifacts across 14 patients, whereas algorithm cleaning resulted in the identification and removal or modification of 653 artifacts across all patients.