Table 4.
Parametric data
All patients 273 |
HFpEF 46 |
HFmrEF 93 |
HFrEF 134 |
P-value (all HF) | HFpEF:HFmrEF | HFmrEF:HFrEF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Native T1 (ms) | 1325 ± 41 | 1310 ± 34 | 1311 ± 32 | 1340 ± 45 | <0.001 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
ECV (%) | 25.5 ± 3.1 | 25.0 ± 2.7 | 24.6 ± 3.2 | 26.3 ± 3.1 | <0.001 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Stress MBF (mL/g/min) | 1.72 ± 0.59 | 1.96 ± 0.61 | 1.89 ± 0.62 | 1.51 ± 0.50 | <0.001 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Rest MBF(mL/g/min) | 0.72 ± 0.22 | 0.78 ± 0.27 | 0.71 ± 0.19 | 0.70 ± 0.22 | 0.070 | 0.170 | 1.0 |
MPR | 2.50 ± 0.84 | 2.62 ± 0.73 | 2.75 ± 0.84 | 2.28 ± 0.84 | <0.001 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Values of native T1, ECV, and stress MBF were not significantly different between HFpEF and HFmrEF. T1 and ECV were significantly higher in HFrEF, and stress MBF significantly lower, when compared with HFmrEF.