Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 26;24(1):38–45. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac204

Table 4.

Parametric data

All patients
273
HFpEF
46
HFmrEF
93
HFrEF
134
P-value (all HF) HFpEF:HFmrEF HFmrEF:HFrEF
Native T1 (ms) 1325 ± 41 1310 ± 34 1311 ± 32 1340 ± 45 <0.001 1.0 <0.001
ECV (%) 25.5 ± 3.1 25.0 ± 2.7 24.6 ± 3.2 26.3 ± 3.1 <0.001 1.0 <0.001
Stress MBF (mL/g/min) 1.72 ± 0.59 1.96 ± 0.61 1.89 ± 0.62 1.51 ± 0.50 <0.001 1.0 <0.001
Rest MBF(mL/g/min) 0.72 ± 0.22 0.78 ± 0.27 0.71 ± 0.19 0.70 ± 0.22 0.070 0.170 1.0
MPR 2.50 ± 0.84 2.62 ± 0.73 2.75 ± 0.84 2.28 ± 0.84 <0.001 1.0 <0.001

Values of native T1, ECV, and stress MBF were not significantly different between HFpEF and HFmrEF. T1 and ECV were significantly higher in HFrEF, and stress MBF significantly lower, when compared with HFmrEF.