Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 22;4:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100111

Table 1.

Summary of studies detailing radial artery catheterisation in conscious participants. EMLA, eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic; N, no; SA, short axis; Y, yes.

Study No. of patients (control/ultrasound) Location Outcomes Approach (short/long axis) Anaesthetised Sedation Operator choice of side Definition of first-attempt success (defines ‘attempt’ and ‘success’ Mode of analgesia EMLA Waveform analysis First-attempt success rate
Notes
Palpation
Ultrasound
Events Total Events Total
Shiver and colleagues20 (2006) 60 (30/30) Emergency department (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Number of attempts
(iii) Time
(iv) Number of cannulas used
SA N Not mentioned Y Y; catheter insertion Not described N N 15 (50%) 30 26 (87%) 30
Seto and colleagues21 (2015) 698 (351/347) Cardiac catheterisation laboratory (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Number of attempts
(iii) Time
SA N Y; as per local practice Y Y; catheter insertion Intra-arterial or s.c. lidocaine as per local practice N N 44% 65% Intra-arterial verapamil/nitroglycerine for spasm prophylaxis
Hansen and colleagues22 (2014) 40 (40/40) Operating theatre (cardiac) (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
(iv) Number of catheters
SA N Not mentioned N Y; catheter insertion Lidocaine s.c. for palpation group only N N 23 (58%) 40 38 (95%) 40 Crossover study
Levin and colleagues23 (2003) 69 (35/34) Operating theatre (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
(iv) Number of catheters
SA N Not mentioned Y Y; catheter insertion Lidocaine s.c. N N 12 (34%) 35 21 (62%) 34
Peters and colleagues15 (2015) 125 (62/63) Operating theatre (cardiac) (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
(iv) Number of redirects
(v) Complications
SA N Y, as per local practice Y Y; catheter insertion Lidocaine s.c. N N 56% 71% No significant difference between palpation/ultrasound
Ueda and colleagues24 (2015) 749 (256/249/Doppler 254) Operating theatre (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Complications
SA Y and N; at discretion of anaesthetist Not mentioned Y Y; transduced arterial waveform Lidocaine s.c. N N 101 (39%) 256 132 (53%) 249
Zaremski and colleagues25 (2013) 183 (91/92) Cardiac catheterisation laboratory (i) ‘Primary’ success rate
(ii) Time
Operator discretion N Not mentioned Y Number of attempts not clearly defined; catheter insertion Not described N N 87% 87% No difference between palpation/ultrasound
Tangwiwat and colleagues26 (2016) 100 (50/50) Operating theatre (neurosurgery) (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Complications
Both N Not mentioned Y Y; catheter insertion Not described N N 65% 69% No significant difference between palpation/ultrasound
Kiberenge and colleagues27 (2018) 260 (128/132) Operating theatre (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
(iv) Number of catheters
SA Y and N; at discretion of anaesthetist Not mentioned Y Y; transduced arterial waveform Not described N N 48% 83%
Gopalasingam and colleagues28 (2017) 40 (40/40) Operating theatre (cardiac) (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
(iv) Number of catheter
(v) Pain
SA N Not mentioned N Y; catheter insertion Lidocaine injection N N 70% 90% Crossover study
Gibbons and colleagues29 (2020) 40 (20/20) Emergency department (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
(iv) Complications
SA N Not mentioned Y Y; catheter insertion Lidocaine injection N N 0% 75%
Yu and colleagues30 (2019) 60 (30/30) Operating theatre (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Complications
SA N Not mentioned Y Y; catheter insertion Lidocaine injection N N 73% 97%
Men and colleagues31 (2022) 92 (46/46) Operating theatre (obstetrics) (i) First-attempt success
(ii) Time
(iii) Number of attempts
SA N Not mentioned Y Y; transduced arterial waveform Median nerve block with lidocaine N N Ultrasound-guided cannulation in both groups: control 78% vs median nerve block 96%

EMLA, eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic; N, no; SA, short axis; Y, yes.