Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;13:1032901. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1032901

TABLE 2.

DNA-DNA hybridization in silico (dDDH), confidence interval (CI), and GC percentage difference between SAICEUPSMT and Pseudomonas spp. closely related.

Subject Assembly accession dDDH CI Diff GC mol %
Pseudomonas atacamensis M7D1 GCA_004801935 61.7 [58.9–64.5] 0.01
Pseudomonas iranensis SWRI54 GCA_014268585 61.5 [58.6–64.3] 0.01
Pseudomonas triticicola SWRI88 GCA_019145375 60.8 [57.9–63.6] 0.10
Pseudomonas siliginis SWRI31 GCF_019145195 59.7 [56.8–62.4] 0.09
Pseudomonas moraviensis LMG 24280 GCF_900105805 46.8 [44.2–49.4] 0.28
Pseudomonas khorasanensis SWRI153 GCA_014268505 37.6 [35.2–40.1] 0.17
Pseudomonas hamedanensis SWRI65 GCA_014268595 36.8 [34.3–39.3] 0.11
Pseudomonas granadensis LMG 27940 GCA_900105485 34.0 [31.5–36.5] 0.27
Pseudomonas tensinigenes ZA 5.3 GCA_014268445 33.6 [31.2–36.1] 0.71
Pseudomonas crudilactis UCMA 17988T GCA_017973755 33.5 [31.1–36.0] 0.75
Pseudomonas neuropathica P155 T GCF_015461835 33.5 [31.1–36.0] 0.66
Pseudomonas baetica LMG 25716 GCA_002813455 33.2 [30.8–35.8] 1.13

Formula d4 (a.k.a. GGDC formula 2): sum of all identities found in HSPs divided by overall HSP length.