Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 19;12:114. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01091-9

Table 3.

Results of meta-analyses

Type of analysis Subgroup Random effect model (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) Heterogeneity
I2 p value
Primary outcome meta-analysis: adjusted survival to discharge or to 30 days after OHCA None 1.01 [0.93; 1.11]–PI [0.76; 1.35] 87%  < 0.01
Secondary outcome meta-analysis: unadjusted survival to discharge or to 30 days after OHCA None 0.68 [0.62; 0.74]–PI [0.43–1.05] 97%  < 0.01
Secondary outcome meta-analysis: unadjusted neurological intact survival None 0.56 [0.49; 0.66]–PI [0.32; 0.98] 95%  < 0.01
Secondary outcome meta-analysis: adjusted neurological intact survival None 0.96 [0.83; 1.10]–PI [0.63; 1.46] 84%  < 0.001
Subgroup analysis by quality of variables of adjustment (as defined in the manuscript) Strong variables (17 studies) 1.05 [0.98; 1.12]–PI [0.82; 1.34] 80%  < 0.001
Medium variables (3 studies) 0.84 [0.68; 1.04]–PI [0.12; 6.07] 32% 0.23
Weak variables (1 study) 0.88 [0.71; 1.09] Not applicable
Subgroup analysis by geographical location Asia (5 studies) 0.94 [0.84; 1.06]–PI [0.63; 1.41] 85%  < 0.01
North America (7 studies) 0.98 [0.88; 1.09]–PI [0.71; 1.34] 88%  < 0.01
Europe (7 studies) 1.10 [0.97; 1.25]–PI [0.79; 1.53] 45% 0.09
Oceania (2 studies) 1.16 [0.93; 1.43] 0% 0.54
Subgroup analysis by OHCA etiology Cardiac etiology (9 studies) 0.99 [0.86; 1.14]–PI [0.64; 1.55] 77%  < 0.001
All etiologies (12 studies) 1.02 [0.95; 1.11]–PI [0.79; 1.32] 90%  < 0.001
Subgroup analysis by type of cohort and number of centres National databases (8 studies) 0.95 [0.87; 1.04]–PI [0.71; 1.28] 92%  < 0.001
Local cohort from EMS (9 studies) 1.10 [0.99; 1.22]–PI [0.82; 1.47] 81%  < 0.001
Monocentric (3 studies) 1.08 [0.84; 1.39]–PI [0.13; 9.19] 5% 0.35
International cohort from EMS (1 study) 0.94 [0.70; 1.26] Not applicable
Subgroup analysis by population denominator All OHCA (15 studies) 1.05 [0.97; 1.13]–PI [0.81; 1.35] 81%  < 0.01
Only survivors to admission (5 studies) 0.89 [0.83; 0.96]–PI [0.74; 1.08] 34% 0.20
Sensitivity analysis omitting papers rated as outliers (in the Baujat plot) None 0.97 [0.91; 1.04]–PI [0.80; 1.17] 55%  < 0.01
Sensitivity analysis omitting papers including data of traumatic etiology for OHCA None 1.01 [0.90; 1.15]–PI [0.68; 1.51] 75%  < 0.01
Sensitivity analysis of papers assessed with high risk of bias None 1.05 [0.98; 1.12]–PI [0.82; 1.34] 80%  < 0.01

OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, EMS emergency medical services

For subgroups analyses, only pooled τ2 results are presented