Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;13:1026352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026352

Table 2.

Confirmatory factor analysis of measurement model (N = 205).

Model χ 2 df Δχ2df) test CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR
Model 1 221.40 98 0.95 0.94 0.08 0.05
Model 2 466.45 101 p < 0.001 0.86 0.84 0.13 0.07
Model 3 759.27 101 p < 0.001 0.76 0.71 0.18 0.16
Model 4 1040.48 103 p < 0.001 0.65 0.59 0.21 0.13
Model 5 1561.81 104 p < 0.001 0.46 0.37 0.26 0.19

All comparisons are relative to Model 1. Model 1: Four factor model. Model 2: Three factor model–likeability and competence items load onto the same factor. Model 3: Three factor model–relational identification and family supportive supervisor behaviors items load onto the same factor. Model 4: Two factor model–likeability, competence, and relational identification items load onto the same factor. Model 5: All items load onto a single factor. CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean residual.