Table 2.
Confirmatory factor analysis of measurement model (N = 205).
| Model | χ 2 | df | Δχ2 (Δdf) test | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 221.40 | 98 | – | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Model 2 | 466.45 | 101 | p < 0.001 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| Model 3 | 759.27 | 101 | p < 0.001 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Model 4 | 1040.48 | 103 | p < 0.001 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.13 |
| Model 5 | 1561.81 | 104 | p < 0.001 | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.19 |
All comparisons are relative to Model 1. Model 1: Four factor model. Model 2: Three factor model–likeability and competence items load onto the same factor. Model 3: Three factor model–relational identification and family supportive supervisor behaviors items load onto the same factor. Model 4: Two factor model–likeability, competence, and relational identification items load onto the same factor. Model 5: All items load onto a single factor. CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean residual.