Table 2.
Patient and clinic staff participant survey content.
| Outcome | Patient participants | Clinic staff | |||||
|
|
Baseline | 1 montha | 3 months | 6 months | Baseline | 6 months | |
| Acceptabilityb | ✓ | N/Ac | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Feasibilityb | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Appropriatenessb | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | |
| PrEPd usee | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A | |
| Contraceptionf | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A | |
| Perceived HIV risk | ✓ |
|
✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A | |
| Reasons for initiating (or declining) PrEP | ✓ | N/A |
|
✓ | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of sexual partnersg | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A | |
| Condom use | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A | |
| HIV status of partners | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | N/A | |
aThere is no month-1 visit for group-2 participants.
bRefers to acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness specific to etiologic sexually transmitted infection testing, assisted partner notification, and integration of sexually transmitted infection and pre-exposure prophylaxis services.
cN/A: not applicable.
dPrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.
eAdherence to PrEP is asked to group-1 and group-3 participants and any group-2 participant who decides to initiate PrEP during the follow-up period. Reasons for discontinuation is asked to individuals with gaps in use or intended cessation of use.
fAsked only to female participants.
gAt baseline, participants are asked about partners in previous 6 months; during follow-up visits, participants are queried about the number of partners since their previous visit (regardless of interval) and in the past month.