Table 2.

Descriptive statistics and interrater comparisons.

Scale	Minimum-maximum			Skewness			Shapiro-Wilk (P value)			Mean (SD)			P valuea		Cohen d
	R1b	R2	R1		R2	R1		R2	R1		R2
Engagement	1.60-4.60	1.60-4.60	–0.40		–0.43	0.94 (.02)		0.97 (.40)	3.40 (0.87)		3.31 (0.69)	.11		0.24
Functionality	2.00-4.75	2.25-4.50	–0.50		–0.96	0.96 (.14)		0.91 (<.001)	3.68 (0.57)		3.73 (0.54)	.47		0.11
Aesthetics	2.33-5.00	2.33-5.00	–0.74		–0.46	0.92 (<.001)		0.93 (.01)	3.90 (0.64)		3.79 (0.74)	.16		0.21
Information	1.75-4.50	1.75-4.17	–0.54		–0.28	0.96 (.14)		0.96 (.08)	3.28 (0.57)		3.31 (0.54)	.67		0.06
MARS-Fac total score	2.17-4.66	2.48-4.50	–0.40		–0.29	0.97 (.30)		0.97 (.36)	3.57 (0.56)		3.54 (0.52)	.53		0.001
Subjective quality	1.00-4.75	1.20-4.75	–0.52		–0.19	0.91 (<.001)		0.94 (.03)	3.32 (1.19)		3.24 (1.00)	.34		0.14

^aP value of the Wilcoxon W or t test.

^bR: reviewer.

^cMARS-Fa: Mobile Application Rating Scale in Farsi.