Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;12(24):15028–15044. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03974

Table 1. Comparative Amino Acid Enrichment for Pravastatin and 6-epi-Pravastatin among Rosetta CoupledMoves Designsa.

  pro-pravastatin
pro-6-epi-pravastatin
position preferred AA comparative enrichment (%) preferred AA comparative enrichment (%)
P80 A 28.49 G 13.88
T95 V 31.44 I (wild-type) 67.81
M179 M (wild-type) 34.17 L 27.04
V180 V (P450pra) 44.91 A (wild-type) 22.87
V182 V (wild-type) 12.08 A 11.14
T286 F 28.53 L 39.92
A388 A (wild-type) 18.71 N/A N/A
a

The differential enrichment of substitutions among Rosetta designs optimized for compactin binding in pro-pravastatin versus pro-6-epi-pravastatin binding mode were calculated. Values represent differences in amino acid abundance in the pravastatin and 6-epi-pravastatin set (eq 1).