Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Jan 7;17(7):1157–1165. doi: 10.1002/alz.12277

Table 2:

Estimated effects (β coefficient (95% Confidence interval)) of MedDiet on the rate of change in global cognitive scores among Chicago Health and Aging Project participants, Interaction model and stratified by Low and High Western diet score over the average follow-up of 6.3 (± 2.8)years §

N Tertile 1 Tertile 2 β (95% CI) Tertile 3 β (95% CI) P for trend
MedDiet association, overall

Basic model 5001 Ref 0.004 (−0.004, 0.012) 0.015 (0.007, 0.024) 0.0005

Basic + CVD§ 4959 Ref 0.003 (−0.004, 0.011) 0.015 (0.006, 0.023) 0.0006

Interaction model betas for the MedDiet*time and MedDiet*Western diet*time interaction term

MedDiet 5001 Ref 0.014 (0.003, 0.025) 0.022 (0.010,.033) 0.0003
MedDiet*Western diet Ref −0.020 (−0.037, −0.005) −0.012 (−0.028,0.003) 0.13

Stratified Analysis

Low Western Diet group

Basic model 2508 Ref 0.013 (0.002, 0.024) 0.020 (0.007, 0.033) 0.002

Basic + CVD§ 2489 Ref 0.013 (0.002, 0.024) 0.019 (0.007, 0.032) 0.003

High Western Diet group

Basic model 2493 Ref −0.006(−0.018, 0.005) 0.010 (−0.002, 0.022) 0.09

Basic + CVD§ 2470 Ref −0.007 (−0.019, 0.005) 0.010 (−0.002, 0.022) 0.09

Basic model adjusted for age, sex, race, education, physical activity, late life cognitive activity and total calories intake, time and interaction term between time and each model covariate.

β=beta coefficient from the model for the interaction term between MIND diet score and time

Interaction model was basic model additionally controlled for western diet score and MedDiet*western diet

§

CVD: cardiovascular conditions included diabetes, hypertension, stroke and myocardial infarction.