Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 16;78(20):2004–2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.064

Table 1.

Rationale for Generalizing Data from Outpatient HFrEF Trials to Hospitalized Patients Who Are Stabilized and/or Pre-Discharge

Location of care does not reliably distinguish biology or risk, and accumulating data suggest that “acute”/ hospitalized HFrEF and stable outpatient HFrEF are a single disease on a continuum.
  • Decisions to admit and discharge from the hospital are inherently subjective and influenced by several non-biologic factors independent from severity of HF presentation (e.g., country, local outpatient healthcare infrastructure, patient/clinician preferences, caregiving and living situation, medico-legal liability climate, financial incentives/penalties).(6)

  • “Acute” HF is often not acute, as many patients have filling pressures begin to rise several days before seeking medical care or presenting to the hospital.(6)

  • Location of care does not reliably distinguish clinical risk, with many outpatients with HF carrying short-term and longer-term mortality risk comparable to (or higher than) patients who are actively hospitalized.(6)

  • New-onset end-organ injury (e.g., new troponin elevation) has traditionally been considered specific to hospitalized HFrEF, but up to ~1 in 10 patients may develop new-onset troponin elevation after they leave the hospital despite apparent clinical stability.(26)

To our knowledge, there are no examples where a chronic therapy improved outcomes among outpatients with HFrEF and was ineffective as chronic therapy when initiated among stabilized patients in the hospital
  • Recent examples with ARNI (PARADIGM-HF and PIONEER-HF) and SGLT2i (DAPA-HF/ EMPEROR-Reduced and SOLOIST-WHF) show concordance in treatment effect when initiated among stable outpatients or stabilized inpatients.

  • Recently completed and ongoing large HF trials are increasingly including hospitalized patients and outpatients under a single trial protocol.

In-hospital initiation of GDMT for chronic HFrEF is consistent with regulatory labels and clinical practice guidelines.
  • US Food and Drug Administration drug labels do not reference location of care, and in-hospital vs outpatient status does not impact eligibility for any standard HFrEF therapy.

  • ACC Expert Consensus documents recommend in-hospital initiation of GDMT for chronic HFrEF among eligible patients, as tolerated.(10)

  • ACC/AHA HF guidelines have an explicit class I recommendation for in-hospital or before hospital discharge initiation of GDMT if not previously established, in absence of contraindications.(11)

Abbreviations: ACC, American College of Cardiology; AHA, American Heart Association; ARNI, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; GDMT, guideline-directed medical therapy; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; SGLT2i, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor