Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 21;216:119430. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119430

Table 6.

Three classes performance comparison of the proposed method and (Chandra et al., 2021) that is using majority voting (ground truth and mathematical evaluation).

Chandra et al. (2020) Proposed Method Accuracy (%)
Phase-1 Naïve Bayes Cosine KNN 88.372 92.2
Decision Tree Linear Discriminant 90.698 92.4
KNN Bagged Trees Ensemble 95.736 95
SVM (Poly Kernel) SqueezeNet Deep Learning 96.124 95.86
ANN Medium Gaussian SVM 96.512 97.2
Majority Voting (Ground Truth) 98.062
Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) 99.79 99.86
Phase-2 KNN Logistic Regression 72.093 87.5
ANN Linear Discriminant 73.256 89.5
Decision Tree Bagged Trees Ensemble 79.070 90.6
Naïve Bayes Cosine KNN 80.814 91.7
SVM (RBF Kernel) Medium Gaussian SVM 86.628 93.3
Majority Voting (Ground Truth) 91.329
Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) 93.08 99.28
Overall Majority Voting (Ground Truth) 93.41
Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) 97.11 99.63