Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Mar 8;43:487–494. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.02.019

Table 3.

Paired t-test comparing body fat percent measured by ADP and estimated using Ethiopian and Caucasian BF% prediction equation among the testing sample of Ethiopian adults.

Paired comparison n Mean Std. P
Pair 1 ADP measured BF% 352 32.38 11.85 0.932
Ethiopian equation predicted BF% 352 32.35 10.52
Difference 352 0.03 5.44
Pair 2 ADP measured BF% 352 32.38 11.85 <0.0001
Caucasian equation predicted BF% 352 25.54 9.78
Difference 352 6.83 5.57

BF%: body fat percept, ADP: Air displacement Plethysmography, Std: standard deviation.

Caucasian equation: BF% = ^1.294 * BMI ‡ 0.20* Age – 11.4* Sex – 8.0.

Ethiopian Equation: BF% = −8.601 + BMI (1.521) + Age (0.243) + Sex (−10.568).