Table 2.
Ranking of the dimensions in the clinical information quality framework in the first round of the eDelphi study, with number of responses by participants (N =35) in selected categories.
| Rank | Information quality dimension | “Strongly relevant,” n (%) | “Somewhat relevant,” n (%) | Combined relevance (“strongly relevant” or “somewhat relevant”), n (%) |
| 1 | Accuracy | 30 (86) | 2 (6) | 32 (92) |
| 2 | Completeness | 18 (51) | 14 (40) | 32 (91) |
| 3 | Interpretability | 23 (66) | 8 (23) | 31 (89) |
| 4 | Plausibility | 13 (37) | 18 (51) | 31 (89) |
| 5 | Provenance | 27 (77) | 7 (20) | 34 (97) |
| 6 | Relevance | 18 (51) | 15 (43) | 33 (94) |
| 7 | Accessibility | 28 (80) | 4 (11) | 32 (91) |
| 8 | Portability | 18 (51) | 12 (34) | 30 (86) |
| 9 | Security | 25 (71) | 5 (14) | 30 (86) |
| 10 | Timeliness | 25 (71) | 9 (26) | 34 (97) |
| 11 | Conformance | 15 (43) | 16 (46) | 31 (89) |
| 12 | Consistency | 10 (29) | 20 (57) | 30 (86) |
| 13 | Maintainability | 20 (57) | 14 (40) | 34 (97) |