Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for students’ post-session feedback questionnaire for inquiry-based digitalized project presentation showing Friedman’s ranking for each item

Descriptive statistics with Friedman’s Ranking for each item (N=129; male=71, female=58)
S.No	Questions	Strongly Agree	Agree	No comments	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Mean±SD	Friedman’s rank
1	Introduction for the inquiry-based digital project making was well explained by the faculty	43	69	14	2	1	4.17±0.74	07
2	The activity was clearly explained and well-organized.	41	72	12	2	2	4.15±0.77	08
3	I felt motivated to move on with this approach till the end of the presentation.	36	58	26	7	2	3.92±0.92	16
4	The clinical cases as an inquiry for project making were well selected by the faculties	62	52	15	0	0	4.36±0.68	01
5	I liked my inquiry topic for the activity	54	60	12	3	0	4.28±0.73	04
6	I have a positive approach to working with peers online or telephonically	18	41	43	21	6	3.34±1.06	26
7	I contributed to my best extent for project preparation and presentation	65	45	14	4	1	4.31±0.85	02
8	I tried to maintain an agreement and co-ordination among groups throughout the task completion	54	56	17	1	1	4.25±0.77	06
9	I was accountable for my work individually as well as for the teamwork.	60	52	13	4	0	4.3±0.78	03
10	Virtual or online or telephonic Group discussions during the activity were a better way of learning.	12	23	58	24	12	2.99±1.06	28
11	Team-based learning through this inquiry-based online activity helped me understand Anatomical topics in a better way.	31	43	27	18	10	3.52±1.22	24
12	I acquired additional information about the topic during a Team activity	47	61	16	4	1	4.16±0.82	09
13	The viewpoint of each group member was well heard and appreciated during the task completion.	36	71	20	2	0	4.09±0.7	11
14a	This learning approach helped me to develop the leadership skills	31	53	30	13	2	3.76±0.98	19
14b	If Yes, kindly specify two of those leadership skills developed:
15	In case of any conflict over the idea for framing or presentation of the project, I now can find consensus for situations.	16	60	48	4	16	3.67±0.77	23
16	I learned to be flexible about making changes in the discussion group.	26	79	20	3	1	3.98±0.72	15
17	I am now able to sense the emotional undercurrents in my group.	24	59	36	9	1	3.74±0.87	20
18a	This study helped me to improve upon my self-directed learning (SDL).	41	51	28	7	2	3.95±0.95	14
18b	Kindly specify how your SDL improved by this method?
19	Such an activity approach will also be beneficial for examination.	23	53	38	7	8	3.59±1.04	22
20	I liked the online presentation of the project with my group members.	33	51	33	8	4	3.78±1.0	18
21	Appropriate time was given to complete the task.	50	67	12	0	0	4.29±0.63	05
22	It reduced the amount of time needed for self-study.	15	45	50	14	5	3.40±0.96	25
23	The concepts learned during these sessions will be useful shortly too.	41	68	16	3	1	4.12±0.77	10
24	The activity allowed me to link different subjects with the anatomy course.	37	65	21	4	2	4.02±0.85	12
25	I think the real model/project presentation for the activity would have been better than the online presentation.	38	30	41	13	7	3.61±1.17	21
26	It had a positive impact on my attitude toward learning.	27	68	29	3	2	3.89±0.81	17
27	I learned a new skill of online presentation which will be helpful to me in near future.	39	58	24	6	2	3.98±0.89	13
28	It was difficult to contact my group member due to the pandemic state.	6	36	32	47	8	2.88±1.04	27