Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 20;22:1560. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08966-4

Table 5.

Transparency of breast cancer websites

Transparency Yes for all Yes for some No
Authorship
 Is there a disclosure of authorship? 18(60%) 0 12 (40%)
 Is there a disclosure of the authors’ credentials? 15(50%) 0 15 (50%)
 Is the author a healthcare professional/expert? 14(47%) 3(10%) 13 (43%)
 Are the credentials verifiable? 23(76%) 2(7%) 5 (17%)
 Are the author’s contact details provided? 15(50%) 0 15 (50%)
Attribution
 Is the source of information clear? 8 (27%) 0 22 (73%)
 Are references given? 4 (13%) 0 26 (87%)
 Is opinion stated as such? 5 (17%) 0 25 (83%)
 Are any working external links provided to scientific reference material/studies? 3 (10%) 2 (7%) 25 (83%)
Currency
 Is the creation date of each page given? 18 (80%) 0 12 (40%)
 Is the date of the last update clearly stated? 5 (17%) 1 (3%) 24 (80%)
 Has the site been updated within the last 4 months? 3 (10%) 1 (3%) 26 (87%)
Disclosure:commercial interests
 If the site is commercial, is the source of funding clearly stated? 7(23%) 2(7%) 21(70%)
 Is the site selling a product? 3(10%) 0 27(90%)
 Does the site carry adverts? 10(33%) 0 20(67%)
 Does the site allow pop-ups? 10(33%) 0 20(67%)
 Is the privacy policy easy to find and clear? 10(33%) 9 11(37%)
 Is personal information disclosed to the site sold to other organizations? 3(10%) 0 27(90%)