Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 21;13(1):220–227. doi: 10.1039/d2ra06481b

Comparison of regeneration method for spent activated carbon in MB adsorption.

No. Activated carbon sources SSA (m2 g−1) q max a (mg g−1) C 0,max b (mg L−1) Dosagec (g L−1) Timemaxd (h) Regeneration Ref.
Method Time (h) Cycles
1 Bituminous coal (commercial) 862 371.75 600 1 480 Electrochemical (6 mA cm−2) 24 3 15
PS: 0.55–0.75 mm
AM: n.a.
2 Coconuts shells 1726 457 1000 1 2.5 Pyrolysise (635 °C) 0.5 1 17
PS: 0.25–0.425 mm
AM: NaOH
3 Spent coal (commercial) 1233 375.93 400 1 6 Steam (983 °C) 2.25 1 18
PS: 2–3 mm
AM: n.a.
4 Charcoal (commercial) 651 (SAC)f; 768 (Pyro-RAC) g; 730 (CO2-RAC)h 177 (SAC)f; 286 (Pyro-RAC)g; n.a. (CO2-RAC)h 1000 1 168 Thermal (350 °C); CO2 (900 °C) 1.5 1 19
PS: 0.3 mm
AM: n.a.
5 Coconut shells (commercial) 1131 154 1500 2 48 Microwave (200 Watt; 305 °C) 0.05 4 16
PS: 1 mm
AM: steam
6 Coconut shells (commercial) 467.91 (SACCS); 688.02 (SACCS-350) 79.31 (SACCS); 160.36 (SACCS-350) 400 0.6 3 Thermal (350 °C) 1 3 This work
PS: 0.1–0.3 mm
AM: steam and thermal
a

Maximum monolayer adsorption capacity.

b

Initial concentration of MB for qmax determination.

c

Adsorbent dosage.

d

Time for qmax determination.

e

n N2 atmosphere.

f

No treatment AC.

g

Thermal regeneration AC.

h

CO2 regeneration AC; SSA: specific surface area; PS: particle size; AM: activation method; n.a.: not available.