TABLE 2.
Mean number of DRMs per study participant identified by Sanger sequencing and NGS at different detection thresholdsa
| ARV class | NGS detection threshold (%) | Mean no. of DRMs by: |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreement (Sanger and NGS) | Discrepancy |
|||
| NGS alone | Sanger alone | |||
| Any DRM (NRTI and/or NNRTI) | 1 | 4.65 | 0.67 | 0.07 |
| 2 | 4.65 | 0.54 | 0.07 | |
| 5 | 4.65 | 0.38 | 0.07 | |
| 10 | 4.65 | 0.21 | 0.07 | |
| 15 | 4.63 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| 20 | 4.55 | 0.05 | 0.17 | |
| NRTI DRMs | 1 | 2.65 | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| 2 | 2.65 | 0.20 | 0.06 | |
| 5 | 2.65 | 0.16 | 0.06 | |
| 10 | 2.65 | 0.08 | 0.06 | |
| 15 | 2.64 | 0.04 | 0.08 | |
| 20 | 2.59 | 0.02 | 0.12 | |
| NNRTI DRMs | 1 | 2.09 | 0.43 | 0.01 |
| 2 | 2.09 | 0.33 | 0.01 | |
| 5 | 2.09 | 0.22 | 0.01 | |
| 10 | 2.09 | 0.13 | 0.01 | |
| 15 | 2.08 | 0.05 | 0.02 | |
ARV, antiretroviral; DRMs, drug resistant mutations; NGS, next generation sequencing; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NNRTI, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.