Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 27;10(6):e02593-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02593-22

TABLE 2.

Amount of iron in different prokaryotic species

Bacterial species Iron (μg Fe/g dry weight) References
Rhodospirillum rubrum Light: 202 (±13)
Dark: 198 (±10)
Rhodopseudomonas spheroides Light: 163 (±21)
Dark: 230 (±24)
Kassner and Kamen (61)a
Chromatium Light: 456 (±76)
Desulfovibrio vulgaris 952 Lancaster et al. (62)b
Enterobacter cloacae 154 Lancaster et al. (62)b
Escherichia coli 223 Hartmann and Braun (63)
280 Abdul-Tehrani et al. (64)
300 Abdul-Tehrani et al. (64)
Micrococcus roseus 200 Rouf (32)
Bacillus cercus 300~400 Rouf (32)
Psudomonas aeruginosa 0.1 Ma et al. (65)
Shewanella oneidensis 147c Daly et al. (66)
Escherichia coli G medium: 430 (±90)
M9 medium: 130 (±50)
This study
Geobacter sulfurreducens Electrode: 1,970 (±226)
Fumarate: 1,960 (±229)
a

Photosynthetic bacteria were grown in different growth conditions with and without light exposure.

b

Iron in D. vulgaris and E. cloacae were estimated with the measured iron per total protein of the cells; we used a conversion factor of 0.55 to convert from protein to volatile solids (28).

c

S. oneidensis iron content was converted from nmol Fe/mg protein to μg Fe/g dry weight using 52.8% protein content as measured previously (67).