TABLE 2.
Amount of iron in different prokaryotic species
| Bacterial species | Iron (μg Fe/g dry weight) | References |
|---|---|---|
| Rhodospirillum rubrum | Light: 202 (±13) Dark: 198 (±10) |
|
| Rhodopseudomonas spheroides | Light: 163 (±21) Dark: 230 (±24) |
Kassner and Kamen (61)a |
| Chromatium | Light: 456 (±76) | |
| Desulfovibrio vulgaris | 952 | Lancaster et al. (62)b |
| Enterobacter cloacae | 154 | Lancaster et al. (62)b |
| Escherichia coli | 223 | Hartmann and Braun (63) |
| 280 | Abdul-Tehrani et al. (64) | |
| 300 | Abdul-Tehrani et al. (64) | |
| Micrococcus roseus | 200 | Rouf (32) |
| Bacillus cercus | 300~400 | Rouf (32) |
| Psudomonas aeruginosa | 0.1 | Ma et al. (65) |
| Shewanella oneidensis | 147c | Daly et al. (66) |
| Escherichia coli | G medium: 430 (±90) M9 medium: 130 (±50) |
This study |
| Geobacter sulfurreducens | Electrode: 1,970 (±226) Fumarate: 1,960 (±229) |
Photosynthetic bacteria were grown in different growth conditions with and without light exposure.
Iron in D. vulgaris and E. cloacae were estimated with the measured iron per total protein of the cells; we used a conversion factor of 0.55 to convert from protein to volatile solids (28).
S. oneidensis iron content was converted from nmol Fe/mg protein to μg Fe/g dry weight using 52.8% protein content as measured previously (67).