Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 7;10(6):e03419-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03419-22

TABLE 3.

Relative abundance (based on DNA) and activity (based on RNA) of the 40 predominant OTUs identified on C. pagurus, i.e., the 20 most abundant OTUs in nonaffected areas (NA) and 20 in black spot syndrome affected areas (BS) were considereda

20 most abundant OTUs in NA Relative abundance (%) DNA
Wald test Relative abundance (%) DNA
Wald test
NA BS NA BS
Alphaproteobacteria
 OTU_2 (Loktanella)b 0.82b 2.95b −4.17b,d 1.06b 5.82b −5.43b,e
 OTU_7 (Robiginitomaculum) 4.18 2.31 0.80 2.00 1.31 0.64
 OTU_16 (Ahrensia) 1.64 0.77 1.13 1.66 0.71 0.67
 OTU_15 (Anderseniella) 1.30 1.33 −0.61c 1.20 1.35 −1.67
 OTU_25 (Hyphomonadaceae) 0.93 0.72 0.39 1.07 0.74 1.04
Gammaproteobacteria
 OTU_29 (Xanthomonadales) 0.99 0.38 0.66 0.62 0.19 1.42
 OTU_24 (Granulosicoccus) 1.16 0.28 1.65 1.49 0.42 1.63
 OTU_4a (Perspicuibacter) 3.41b 1.09b −2.61b,c 3.85b 1.18b −3.90b,d
 OTU_13 (Thiotrichaceae) 1.20 1.33 −0.34 0.57 0.88 −0.04c
 OTU_60 (Cellvibrionaceae) 0.83 0 2.51 0.42 0 −0.99
Flavobacteriia
 OTU_19 (Tenacibaculum) 2.30 0.19 −0.22 0.87 0.11 −0.18
 OTU_10 (Maritimimonas) 2.07 2.46 0.21 0.74 1.15 0.47c
 OTU_37 (Aquibacter) 1.02 0.13 2.00 0.50 0.06 1.49
 OTU_52 (Maribacter) 0.93 0.10 2.26 0.20 0.05 1.91
Acidimicrobiia
 OTU_14 (Sva0996 marine group) 2.39 0.58 1.79 2.09 0.73 1.26
 OTU_21 (Acidimicrobiales) 1.54 0.44 1.53 1.40 0.55 1.33
Nitrospira
 OTU_18 (Nitrospira) 1.30 0.38 1.65 1.84 0.36 2.05
Bacilli
 OTU_41 (Granulicatella) 1.03 1.10 1.03 0.40 0.82 −0.36
Sphingobacteriia
 OTU_38 (Portibacter) 0.86 0.43 1.92 0.51 0.29 1.11
Mollicutes
 OTU_6 (Mycoplasma) 4.46 9.20 0.69 3.98 6.52 0
20 most abundant OTUs in BS Relative abundance (%) DNA
Wald test Relative abundance (%) DNA
Wald test
NA BS NA BS
Alphaproteobacteria
 OTU_2 (Loktanella)b 0.82b 2.95b −4.16b,d 1.06b 5.83b −5.43b,e
 OTU_8 (Pelagibius) 0.02 2.22 −4.69c 0.04 2.25 −5.28
 OTU_7 (Robiginitomaculum) 4.18 2.31 0.80 2 1.31 0.64
 OTU_17 (Sulfitobacter) 0.32 0.93 −1.94 0.44 0.85 −2.27
 OTU_15 (Anderseniella) 1.30 0.78 −0.61 1.20 1.35 −1.67
 OTU_16 (Ahrensia) 1.64 0.77 1.13 1.66 0.71 0.67
 OTU_23 (Thalassobius) 0.62 0.96 −0.99 0.62 0.95 −0.43
Gammaproteobacteria
 OTU_3 (Perspicuibacter) 0.05 4.98 −3.13f 0.02 4.78 −4.07
 OTU_4 (Perspicuibacter)b 3.41b 1.09b −2.61b,c 3.85b 1.18b −3.90b,d
 OTU_5 (Eionea) 0 1.67 −0.90 0 1.09 −6.08
 OTU_11 (Cocleimonas) 0.76 1.32 −0.74 0.37 0.89 0.04
 OTU_12 (Arenicella)b 0.23b 1.38b −4.17b,d 0.20b 1.01b −4.87b,e
 OTU_13 (Thiotrichaceae) 1.20 1.33 −0.34 0.57 0.88 −0.04
 OTU_9 (Cellvibrionaceae)b 0.01b 2.16b −6.43b,e 0a 2.12b −11.47b,e
Flavobacteriia
 OTU_1 (Aquimarina)b 0.31b 18.67b −6.86b,e 0.18b 14.51b −7.29b,e
 OTU_10 (Maritimimonas) 2.07 2.46 0.21 0.74 1.15 0.47
Mollicutes
 OTU_6 (Mycoplasma) 4.46 9.20 0.69 3.98 6.52 0
Bacilli
 OTU_41 (Granulicatella) 1.03 1.10 1.03b 0.40 0.82 −0.36
Betaproteobacteria
 OTU_68 (Comamonadaceae) 0.22 1.10 −1.17 0.26 1.17 −0.78
Deltaproteobacteria
 OTU_20 (Eel-36e1D6) 0.03 0.75 −1.55 0.03 2.84 −2.71
a

Classification of OTUs is given on class level and lowest definable taxonomic level (in brackets).

b

Significant changes in abundance based on Wald statistics.

c

Significance for differences in abundance based on Wald statistic was not calculated due to violation of negative binomial distribution or low counts.

d

P < 0.01, with the significance level after false discovery rate adjustment following Benjamini and Hochberg (53).

e

P < 0.001, with the significance level after false discovery rate adjustment following Benjamini and Hochberg (53).

f

P < 0.05, with the significance level after false discovery rate adjustment following Benjamini and Hochberg (53).