Table 3.
Description of cases and controls.
| Parameters | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author, year, reference | Helenius et al. (2005) (22) | Pischon et al. (2010) (24) | Sezer et al. (2012) (25) |
| Study type | Case-control | Case-control | Case-control |
| Country | Finland | Germany | Turkey |
| Source of funding | Helsinki University Central Hospital, Orion Research Foundation, Finnish Dental Association, Finnish Women’s Dental Association | German Research Foundation and Habilitation Fellowship from Charite Universitatsmedizin | NR |
| Diagnostic criteria used for AS | mNY | mNY | mNY |
| Disease duration of AS (years) | 14.7 (8.9%) | 11.7 (7.4) | 5.04 (6.13) |
| Diagnostic criteria used for PD | CPI score ≥3 (PPD≥4 mm) | Mean CAL >3 mm | 1999 consensus classification of periodontal disease; at least 4 teeth with PPD>5 mm+CAL ≥ 2 mm at the same time |
| Study duration | NR | 36 | 6 |
| Sample size | Cases: 18 Controls: 77 |
Cases: 48 Controls: 48 |
Cases: 48 Controls: 48 |
| Sex, n (%) | Female Cases: 6 (33.3) Controls: 50 (64.9) |
Female Cases: 14 (29.2) Controls: 14 (29.2) |
Female Cases: 13 (27.1) Controls: 13 (27.1) |
| Age mean (±SD) (years) | Cases: 42.4 (11.6) Controls: 42.2 (12.7) |
Cases: 40.4 (11.7) Controls: 39.8 (12.1) |
Cases: 34.27 (9.73) Controls: 33.33 (9.67) |
| Recruitment | Cases: Rheumatology Outpatient Department, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital Controls: Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki |
Cases: Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite-Universitatsmedizin Controls: General Dental Office |
Cases: Department of Rheumatology, Gaziantep University, Faculty of Medicine Controls: Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry |
| Inclusion criteria | Cases:
|
Cases:
|
Cases:
|
| Exclusion criteria | Cases:
|
Cases and controls:
|
Cases and controls:
|
| PI | NR | Cases: 0.55 (0.37) Controls: 0.32 (0.19) p<0.001, S |
Cases: 1.60 (0.61) Controls: 1.53 (0.52) p=0.547, NS |
| PPD | NR | Cases: 3.06 (0.71) Controls: 2.67 (0.49) p=0.002, S |
Cases: 3.17 (0.82) Controls: 3.15 (0.90) p=0.91, NS |
| CAL | NR | Cases: 3.20 (0.74) Controls: 2.73 (0.50) p<0.001, S |
Cases: 2.35 (1.93) Controls: 2.04 (1.81) p=0.419, NS |
| BOP | NR | Cases: 56.5 (23.0) Controls: 25.0 (37.09) p<0.001, S |
Cases: 46.77 (3.17) Controls: 33.09 (2.98) p<0.001, S |
| Number of teeth missing | Cases: 3.44 (3.17) Controls: 2.13 (2.01) p=0.108, NS |
Cases: 1.95 (2.31) Controls: 2.44 (2.62) p=0.362, NS |
NR |
| Number of teeth present | NR | NR | NR |
| Periodontitis, n (%) | Cases: 10 (56) Controls: 20 (26) p=0.015, S |
Cases: 23 (47.9) Controls: 15 (31.3) p=0.095, NS |
Cases: 18 (37.5) Controls: 14 (29.2) p=0.386, NS |
| Lopez criteria | NR | NR | NR |
| Average AL value >2.6 mm | NR | NR | NR |
SD: standard deviation; PI: plaque index; PPD: probing pocket depth; CAL: clinical attachment loss; BOP: bleeding on probing; NR: not relevant; mNY: modified New York; AS: ankylosing spondylitis; PD: periodontal disease; AL: attachment loss; NS: not significant; S: significant.