Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 16;101(50):e32210. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032210

Table 1.

Summary of the patients’ data.

Patients (no.) Age (yr)/sex Levels Follow-up (mo) Kyphosis angle (º) Frankel grade Fusion (mo)
PRE POST FFU PRE POST FFU
1 23/M T8–T9 24 19 11 11 A B D 4
2 47/F T9–T10 36 12 8.4 10 A B E 5
3 48/F T8–T9 48 14 10.6 11 C D E 5
4 56/M T6–T7 48 15 10 10 B C D 6
5 57/M T9–T10 42 17 9 9 B C E 5
6 37/M T5–T6 24 18 10.2 12 A B D 4
7 42/F T7–T8 24 13 7.2 8 A B E 5
8 29/M T8–T9 30 12 7 6 B D E 4
9 32/F T10–T11 36 16 8.8 10 C D E 4
10 48/F T10–T11 24 20 10.3 12 C D E 5
11 45/F T9–T10 36 18 9.6 11 A C D 6
12 55/M T9–T10 48 14 9.8 11 B C E 6
13 24/M T9–T10 24 11 5.6 7 A C E 5
14 62/M T8–T9 48 13 13 11 B D E 6
15 74/F T7–T8 42 15 8 10 C D D 8
16 61/F T6–T7 36 13 6.4 6 C D E 6
Mean values 46.3 ± 14.5 35.6 ± 9.6 15.0 ± 3.4 9.1 ± 1.9 9.7 ± 1.9 5.3 ± 1.1

FFU = final follow-up, P = .041, POST = 4 weeks postoperation, PRE = preoperation, t = –2.239, t = 8.969.

Analyzed by paired t-test, comparing 4 weeks postoperative with preoperative in Kyphosis angle, P = .000, Analyzed by paired t-test, comparing final follow-up with 4 weeks postoperative in Kyphosis angle.