Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 20;7(1):e811. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000811

Table 3.

Seropositivity Rates According to Treatment Status

Author CLL N Response (n Evaluable)
Treatment-naive Active Treatment Prior Treatment In Remission
Second dose
 Sun et al (2021)35 58 71% (21) 50% (34) 100% (3) NA
 Dong et al (2021)30 23 81.3% (16) 28.6% (7) NA NA
 Shen et al (2021)27 160 63.4% (82) 21.9% (32) NA 67.5% (40)a
 Molica et al (2021)33 70 87% (23) 41.7% (36) NA 87.5% (8)a
 Parry et al (2022)36 500 78% (284) 43% (200) [on/prior] 73% (11)b 71% (75)
 Bagacean et al (2022)32 506 72% (210) 22% (166) 60% (130) NA
 Benjamini et al (2022)37 373 61% (158) 14% (113)c 42% (55)d NA
 Herishanu et al (2021)40 167 55.2% (58) 16% (75) 64.7% (34) 79.2% (24)
 Roeker et al (2021)38 44 94% (18) NA 23% (26) NA
 Tadmor et al (2021)39 84 76.2% (16) 28.6% (6) 61.9% (26) 27.2% (22)
 Bergman et al (2021)34 79 84.6% (26) NA NAe NA
 Ujjani et al (2022)23 37 50% (14) NA NA NA
 Haydu et al (2022)41 36 72% (25) 33% (6) 0% (5) NA
 Molica et al (2022)31 2082 73% (533) NA NA NA
 Haggenburg et al (2022)45 94 70% (56) NA NA NA
Third dose (booster results)
 Herishanu et al (2022)42 172 40% (40) 12% (100) 40.6% (32) 41.7% (24)
 Del Poeta et al (2021)44 46 88.2% (17)f 34.5% (29) NA NA

aComplete or partial remission.

bPrior targeted therapy.

cTargeted therapy.

dPrior targeted therapy.

ePrior ibrutinib: 9 (55.6%); prior anti-CD20 (median 13 mo): 18 (88.9%). fIncludes prior treatment.

CLL = chronic lymphocytic leukemia; n = number of patients; NA = not available.