Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Oct 8;13(3):257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.025

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of subjects and VCUG reports

Characteristic N=602
No. (%) or Median [IQR]
Gender
Male 49 (8.1%)
Female 553 (91.9%)
Age at VCUG (months) 11 [5, 30]
Reference Radiologist VUR Grade 1
0 319 (26.5%)
I 104 (8.6%)
II 400 (33.2%)
III 321 (26.7%)
IV 54 (4.5%)
V 1 (0.1%)
VCUG read by a pediatric radiologist 2
Yes 459 (76.2%)
No 134 (22.3%)
VCUG performed at 3,4
FSPH 297 (49.3%)
PHWH 184 (30.6%)
NPF 87 (14.5%)
ORF 33 (5.5%)
1

Reference grade not available for 5 ureters

2

Nine reports lacked information to identify the radiologist

3

FSPH – Free-standing pediatric hospital; PHWH – pediatric ‘hospital within a hospital’; NPH – non-pediatric hospital; ORF – outpatient radiology facility

4

One facility type was unknown