Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 21;12(4):178–181. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758389

Table 1. Comparison of lidocaine versus EMLA cream following LP.

EMLA cream Lidocaine p -Value
LP and local analgesia characteristics
Initial randomized local analgesic 5 (50%) 5 (50%)
Adverse local reaction to analgesic 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Minutes between local analgesic and start of LP, median (min–max) 145 (85–213) 2 (1–6)
Amount of lidocaine, mL, median (min–max) 2 (1.5–3.0)
Number of lidocaine sticks, median (min–max) 1 (1–3)
LP needle sticks, median (min–max) 1 (1–3) 1 (1–5)
Required more 1 LP needle stick 2 (20%) 2 (20%)
Resident involvement in lumber puncture 2 (20%) 3 (30%) 1.00
Signs of pain with local analgesia
 Increase in heart rate
 Movement
0 (0%) 5 (50%)
1
4
0.03
Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale Scores
Baseline, pre-LP
Any reported pain (WBS > 0)
Pre-LP, median (min–max)

0 (0%)
0 (0–0)

0 (0%)
0 (0–0)
30–60 minutes post-LP
Any reported pain (WBS > 0)
30–60 minutes post-LP, median (min–max)

0 (0%)
0 (0–0)

0 (0%)
0 (0–0)
24 hours post-LP
Any reported pain (WBS > 0)
24 hours post-LP, median (min–max)

2 (20%)
0 (0–8)

3 (30%)
0 (0–8)

1.00
0.79
PRN pain medication 24 hours post-LP
Acetaminophen
Any reported pain, n (%)
mg, median (min–max)

1 (10%)
0 (0–325)

2 (20%)
0 (0–1290)

1.00
0.18
Opioid
Any reported pain, n (%)
mg, median (min–max)

0 (0%)
0 (0–0)

1 (10%)
0 (0–5.325)

1.00
0.32

Abbreviations: LP, lumbar puncture; PRN, pro re nata; WBS, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.