Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5;26(1):105692. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105692

Table 2.

Statistics of diagnosis efficiency of FEBrNet-recommended frames and other frame sets

Modality AUC (95%CI) Cut-off Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) p value
R_Frames 0.912 (0.888–0.936) 0.416 84.4 87.4 86.2 NA
Phy_Images 0.909 (0.884–0.935) 0.401 87.8 84.0 85.3 0.715
Fix_Frames 0.852 (0.821–0.883) 0.490 75.6 79.9 78.2 0.000
All_Frames 0.881 (0.852–0.910) 0.436 76.4 89.7 84.3 0.002
Ultrasound 0.820 (0.788–0.853) NA 98.7 65.3 79.6 0.000
Mammography 0.796 (0.759–0.833) NA 92.1 67.1 77.8 0.000

Note: AUC: area under the curve; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; R_Frames: responsible frame; Phy_Images: doctor frame selection; Fix_Frames: fixed interval frame selection; All_Frames: all frames of video; Ultrasound: Diagnosis by senior ultrasound doctors; Mammography: Diagnosis by senior mammography doctors; p: R Frames vs. others; NA: Not Applicable.