Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22:1–23. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10869-022-09869-1

Table 3.

Repeated measure multilevel modeling results: DV = safety compliance

Coefficients
(standard error)
95% confidence interval df p-
value
b0 Intercept 4.98 (.14)** 4.71–5.25 19.26  < .01
b1 Time  − .08 (.03)**  − .14 to − .03 20.74 .01
b2 Safety climate .27 (.12)* .03 to .52 322.70 .03
b3 Emotional exhaustion  − .12 (.03)**  − .18 to − .05 551.50 .00
b4 Time × safety climate .03 (.02)  − .01 to .07 176.30 .13
b5 Time × emotional exhaustion .02 (.01)* .00 – .03 207.70 .04
b6 Safety climate × emotional exhaustion .02 (.01)**  − .17 to − .03 143.00 .01
b7 Gender  − .06 (.08)  − .21 to .09 653.50 .44
b8 Tenure  − .01 (.00)*  − .02 to .00 1119.00 .01
Random effects variance (standard deviation)
e0ijk Individual-level random intercept = .06 (.25)
e1ijk Individual-level random slope for time = .01 (.09)
r00jk Station-level random intercept = .01 (.12)
r01jk Station-level random intercept = .00 (.01)
u00k Department-level random intercept = .01 (.12)
u01k Department-level random intercept = .00 (.02)
Residual variance (standard deviation) = .16 (.41)

** p < .01, * p < .05, degrees of freedom and statistical significance testing were based on Satterthwaite’s approximation method (Hrong-Tai Fai and Cornelius, 1996; Kuznetsova et al., 2017; Satterthwaite, 1946)